Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
someothherguyy
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
someothherguyy
5d ago
feels and hype
2.
▲
by
someothherguyy
8d ago
its what all LLM users have all been doing, profiting off others' IP through a number cruncher, while relinquishing their own
3.
▲
by
someothherguyy
8d ago
so? people still need to use and visualize a map that isn't some strange abstraction. how useful is a population map when attempting to locate a small country to understand geography?
4.
▲
by
someothherguyy
8d ago
> it is shocking to see that you have not even read the paper and you are just presenting it directly what the fuck do you know about what i have read? i was responding to a statement from the article. the link i shared is to an article
5.
▲
by
someothherguyy
8d ago
> Putting one of those participant’s phone numbers into WhatsApp reveals a profile picture of a law enforcement patch. A pawn with wings sits in the center, surrounded by lightning bolts. The patch reads, “Laredo Sector Tech Ops PITT,” i
6.
▲
by
someothherguyy
8d ago
https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2120481119 there is some very depressing research on this topic
7.
▲
by
someothherguyy
8d ago
> Much like freedom of speech means someone can speak abhorrently, freedom of enterprise means someone can do bad or dumb business things. No?
8.
▲
by
someothherguyy
10d ago
> Would've been a lot more interesting of they promoted a population map why?
9.
▲
by
someothherguyy
10d ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheating_(biology)
10.
▲
by
someothherguyy
11d ago
yeah, sometimes cheaters winning is a net benefit or at least acceptable. although, i don't think those cases above are, heh.
11.
▲
by
someothherguyy
11d ago
cheater detection and self-correction is important in systems. i am not sure "fucked-up" is a meaningful way to look at species-level things.
12.
▲
by
someothherguyy
14d ago
yeah, i mean, that might be meaningful, or not. i have thousands of pictures of my grandparents, great grandparents, etc that none of their kids (or many grandkids, great grandkids, etc) wanted. seems like, eventually (mostly) no one cares
13.
▲
by
someothherguyy
14d ago
there is deeper thought on this topic beyond douglas hofstadter (~20 years ago for strange loop and prior for GEB) and scott aaronson any cognitive science textbook will bring some thoughts, or a cursory google scholar search
14.
▲
by
someothherguyy
14d ago
i am more of the position of most human generated information should be ephemeral. for instance, i wish this site would let individuals have that need met, alas. no information is so important to violate others' right to their own prop
15.
▲
by
someothherguyy
14d ago
everyone should do this, but it is difficult. imo, it is better to talk with your parents beforehand (if possible) to understand what they want to share with you and what they do not.
16.
▲
by
someothherguyy
14d ago
not sure if i got this right, but it sounds like you experienced some things and you want to share something, but you are telling others how to live instead.
17.
▲
by
someothherguyy
14d ago
a lot of these studies with technology, etc, are concerned with outcomes in primary/secondary(high) school, which, tbf, no one gives a fuck about, as life outcomes are what matters a great harm in human society is overconfident extrapo
18.
▲
by
someothherguyy
14d ago
based on the dates, links, publishing status, and content, these seem somewhat contrived, but i will read them, when i have the chance. that first paper is on academic outcomes in uraguay, with a particular set of testing that i am not fami
19.
▲
by
someothherguyy
14d ago
> It is absolutely not Luddite to note that pretty much no technological revolution privileged elementary-school aged kids who had exposure over those who did not. That divergence starts manifesting in the teenage years, after basic cogn
20.
▲
by
someothherguyy
14d ago
i live in ny. there are still "devices" in schools in rich and poor communities. many have "banned" personal devices, but that isn't really meaningful for this discussion. this is about banning existing technology f
21.
▲
by
someothherguyy
14d ago
it seems incredibly short sighted to bar students from something that exists in the world, that they will need to interact with and be aware of in the future. also, LLMs are great at summarizing knowledge, which is likely a better fit for e
22.
▲
by
someothherguyy
14d ago
https://beckreedriden.com/the-black-box-problem-in-ai-trade-...
23.
▲
by
someothherguyy
14d ago
normally depends on the type of traffic you are serving, but that seems like a weird thing to say as a blanket statement.
24.
▲
by
someothherguyy
14d ago
voting by mail is pretty popular these days https://electionlab.mit.edu/research/voting-mail-and-absente... more controversy: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/25/us/mail-in-voting-sta
25.
▲
by
someothherguyy
14d ago
It seems to be nearly a third (short read): https://electionlab.mit.edu/research/voting-mail-and-absente...
26.
▲
by
someothherguyy
14d ago
as you say, everyone does this. you just have the evidence and the humility to admit it.
27.
▲
by
someothherguyy
17d ago
that is anxiety, not design
28.
▲
by
someothherguyy
17d ago
wouldn't that just make your connection load worse?
29.
▲
by
someothherguyy
18d ago
is this some meta commentary on cgit's performance? (site doesn't load) see: https://github.com/zx2c4/cgit
30.
▲
by
someothherguyy
18d ago
author commenting on such things: https://morello.dev/blog/defrag98-rebuild what it looked like before https://morello.dev/blog/windows-98-defrag-simulator a previous discussion: https:/
More ›