Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
some_random
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
1.
▲
by
some_random
7d ago
Well, this has become one of the most pro-china forums around so it shouldn't be too surprising.
2.
▲
by
some_random
7d ago
There is a societal consensus that driving is a privilege which can be restricted or revoked, not that you give up your rights by driving. In fact the opposite is true, the courts have found that drivers have fourth amendment rights for ins
3.
▲
by
some_random
17d ago
Hope you all are excited for the most important parts of the internet to be completely unusable by default on Linux in a few years.
4.
▲
by
some_random
17d ago
Even today, every member of the Canadian military swears fealty to the King of England.
5.
▲
by
some_random
18d ago
Medicare alone costs $1.21 Trillion, I find that extremely hard to believe.
6.
▲
by
some_random
23d ago
Is is possible that some technologies could have longevity trade offs and not be "planned obsolescence"?
7.
▲
by
some_random
23d ago
That's exactly what it is, and it's pretty important to run
8.
▲
by
some_random
23d ago
Selective enforcement is just tyranny, but what I think they were getting at is a minimum size enshrined in law. I don't think it's a great idea, really highlights how arbitrary this all is and presents a risk of advantaging the w
9.
▲
by
some_random
27d ago
The only time iPhones were $199 was when they were subsidized by lock-in contracts, they were never actually that cheap.
10.
▲
by
some_random
1mo ago
It's the same game that's been played since the invention of commerce.
11.
▲
by
some_random
2mo ago
If the Chinese look like a beacon of hope you then you really should be looking closer.
12.
▲
by
some_random
2mo ago
Distillation is objectively easier than training a model from scratch, that's why all these Chinese labs are doing it.
13.
▲
by
some_random
2mo ago
A crackdown would probably be an FBI responsibility, the NSA is not a law enforcement agency and absolutely does not have the authority.
14.
▲
by
some_random
2mo ago
It has a pessimistic title and just like redditors most HN voters don't read the articles they vote on.
15.
▲
by
some_random
2mo ago
I think the author is just totally ignorant, there's a whole community of security companies and researchers who are scanning every single package as it's released and have been doing so for some time now. Some of the details like
16.
▲
by
some_random
2mo ago
Any one of thousands of policy options that aren't "just ban it".
17.
▲
by
some_random
2mo ago
There are two issues with nanny statism, the first is poorly informed kneejerk overreactions, the second is immediately jumping to heavyhanded policies. In your example even the absurd warning label is significantly less of an issue than fl
18.
▲
by
some_random
2mo ago
It's none of their business whether or not others choose to use ECC. It's absolutely his business whether or not authorities force them to use ECC RAM or else.
19.
▲
by
some_random
2mo ago
This is one of the most pro-china forums out there, what are you talking about
20.
▲
by
some_random
2mo ago
When you are used to thinking of citizens as children who need a nanny, all problems become bedtime shaped.
21.
▲
by
some_random
2mo ago
If you don't want the US to have your date of birth, photo, fingerprints, etc then don't go to the US. It's that easy.
22.
▲
by
some_random
2mo ago
I think it's a pattern that reinforces itself, as a nanny state develops it's opinion of it's people worsens and it's more willing to use force to compel them.
23.
▲
by
some_random
2mo ago
If you expect that level of incompetence from your elected officials than maybe the problem isn't the US.
24.
▲
by
some_random
2mo ago
It's to validate that the fingerprints of the person arriving are the same as the fingerprints of the person who got the passport.
25.
▲
by
some_random
2mo ago
It's just for people crossing the border, and yeah it's mostly fingerprints. The point is mainly to detect fraudulent passports, and the rest of the data is self explanatory (the US obviously is interested in people visiting that
26.
▲
by
some_random
2mo ago
What a stupid, hysterical claim. This "sensitive data" is just what's on your passport, fingerprints, criminal history, and terrorism flags (from European agencies), only for people crossing the border. I don't see how y
27.
▲
by
some_random
2mo ago
Cool in principle, but I had an awful lot of trouble finding 7 letter words on the wordlist.
28.
▲
by
some_random
2mo ago
Every entertainment medium has some level of prestige associated with it mostly based on how old it is, which is the primary reason book reading is venerated. As for the democracy comment, I think the logic there smart people read books and
29.
▲
by
some_random
3mo ago
In my experience this complete lack of reproducibility is what happens when you throw LLMs at a complicate problem without sufficient shaping, workflows, etc. Go ahead, let LLMs invoke LLMs invoke LLMs and by the end you'll get an outp
30.
▲
by
some_random
3mo ago
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another
More ›