sokrates85

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by sokrates85 7y ago

   He made the claims but not sure if that paper ever appeared.
2. 2.▲
   by sokrates85 7y ago

   I agree that the integer factorization is a poor choice. Last statement in the Abstract talks about sampling and optimization which could be the bigger point. Their pre-processing seems like simply expanding out their cost function that&#x2
3. 3.▲
   by sokrates85 7y ago

   x = rand() % 2 always gives a random number. You can't correlate them that way. Needs to be a tunable random number and technically needs to be "true" as mentioned. But I don't think that the authors would disagree wit