snitko

8 ms·

1.
by snitko 4y ago
How was it, when Gregory House put it... "...and no, I don't have a pain-management problem. I have a pain problem. But who knows, maybe I'm too high to tell..."
2.
by snitko 4y ago
Perhaps the problem isn't your particular environment, but these languages infrastructure.
3.
by snitko 5y ago
This is a friend of mine and I'm always skeptical of his ideas being overly technical, but sometimes we all tend to forget that programming can be a form of art and expression too, even in benign things.
4.
by snitko 5y ago
Oh god, thanks you, something at least. That's gonna save us all.
5.
Ask HN: If you have 1000 microservices, is hierarchy still an antipattern?
2 points by snitko 6y ago|1 comments
6.
by snitko 7y ago
Can we please stop writing html inside Javascript or Ruby in this case?
7.
by snitko 7y ago
Explain the mechanism. How do I know this organization made this much money and that the amount I'm being paid is fair in regards to their profits? How can this code track all the money the company is making? It's not like they&#x
8.
by snitko 7y ago
Explain the mechanism by which people who invest can exercise their rights as stakeholders, receive dividends etc? Who's to enforce they actually own anything? What's stopping this project from taking all the money and producing n
9.
by snitko 7y ago
Except Bitcoin. And the market justly reflects it via price.
10.
by snitko 7y ago
What has it delivered exactly? Where is it being used that's not itself a scam? MakerDAO - which seems to be some sort of token issuance thing - has no real world mechanism for enforcement. That is, if an autonomous decentralized organ
11.
by snitko 7y ago
Whether or not you're aligned with Bitcoin political values and goals, please don't be duped by Ethereum. It may appear as something useful, without the stigma of Bitcoin being black market money. However, you ONLY need black mark
12.
by snitko 7y ago
Vitalik and ETH are the definitions of scam and scammer. He's very good at obfuscating it by appearing very smart: read his articles and tweets, they always sound complex, but can be rewritten in much simpler terms. And ETH is the same
13.
by snitko 7y ago
I hope they donate to projects with anonymous developers, not businesses.
14.
by snitko 7y ago
What? If I'm an open source developer online, I doubt local tax authorities have the means to track me down. I can be anywhere in any country.
15.
by snitko 7y ago
How this works? They send btc and people use them. You're thinking in the old frame of reference: you don't need banks, legal entities or identities even to produce code. Who cares if it's recognized or not.
16.
by snitko 7y ago
Knowing the founder, find it hard to believe. The guy who fled Russia to avoid persecution has little tolerance for any government trying to mess with people's privacy. Culturally, Russia itself has a lot more in common with the west.
17.
by snitko 7y ago
Ah, great, all the features we don't need, but would have to upgrade to anyway.
18.
by snitko 7y ago
I feel like this is all insane and doesn't make any sense. At least to the general public. What difference does it make? It doesn't even improve our understanding of reality in any meaningful way, it doesn't impact us in any
19.
by snitko 7y ago
Looking forward to it, very interested. However, I'm going to be honest with you - it'd be a hard decision to rely on a service rather than an open-source software. Like, you guys can go bust any time and while the runner is indee
20.
by snitko 7y ago
Into a separate repo. See my other reply: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20647649
21.
by snitko 7y ago
I'll give you a counter example: whenever I change CI workflow for something that has nothing to do with the repo - like a new deployment scheme to staging - I have to go and ask people to merge/rebase from master into their branc
22.
by snitko 7y ago
So, it's a very interesting situation. On one hand, I agree with you: when I start a new project, I am the master of it, I take care of everything and I need to make sure deployment and testing are implemented as early as possible. But
23.
by snitko 7y ago
I hear you. I thought about it and I think you need to reframe the problem. If a change in the application breaks your CI, it means you need to adjust the CI so it doesn't break when such changes are introduced. In my experience, these
24.
by snitko 7y ago
It's a horrible trend. CI should not be tied to version control. I mean we all have to deal with it now, but I'd much rather have my CI agnostic and not have config files for it checked into the repo. I've browsed through the
25.
by snitko 7y ago
I never said those products don't provide value, I only said they're not exceptional in providing that value and that value can be obtained by carefully considering alternative solutions.
26.
by snitko 7y ago
This is the best advice.
27.
by snitko 7y ago
I'm happy to pay. To me, however, the value lies in predictability, sustainability and avoiding the risk of deplatforming. Tech companies come and go and are subject to political issues (as proven by Github). Thus, sometimes, it's
28.
by snitko 7y ago
I'm a founder. I'm extremely careful not throwing money. And I'm especially am aware of the changing environment. The internet is no longer free. You depend on a third party, you lose. The only true way is to gradually build
29.
by snitko 7y ago
Bitcoin.
30.
by snitko 7y ago
Don't see it that way. If I set up a process once, using software that's been tested and been around for a while, it's extremely convenient. And free. And there's no risk of deplatforming.

More ›