snehk

4 ms·

1.
by snehk 1mo ago
You're spending your own money. I'm pretty sure that if there was one member of your family that didn't have money for food or medicine, you'd spend it there instead of donating it, wouldn't you?
2.
by snehk 3mo ago
You can't trust those numbers, though. If you get drunk and jump into a river and drown it's counted as a heat related death.
3.
by snehk 3mo ago
Nope.
4.
by snehk 3mo ago
I wonder why Poland doesn't have these problems even though everyone uses social media including teens.
5.
by snehk 3mo ago
> So what are some of the best talking points to "sell" solar and wind to the unconvinced? Ensure that the prices decrease for people with existing contracts . The hatred comes from people being told that it's better and
6.
by snehk 5mo ago
> my provider only produces green energy. But in the past raising gas prices would have also raised my prices, regardless. So yes, regular consumers can profit from this. It's one single grid. You get coal, nuclear, wind, solar, and
7.
by snehk 5mo ago
Has this benefitted the regular/average consumer? Nope. They pay more than they were with the "old" energy mix of more gas and nuclear. Telling people it could be worse isn't really something to be proud of. I personally
8.
by snehk 6mo ago
People understand that this has nothing to do with the wellbeing of any teenager, right? This is only about establishing a mechanism to prevent individuals from doing things online. Why do people fall for the "protect the children&quot
9.
by snehk 8mo ago
My point was that they don't get funding to pray and instead provide real medical services.
10.
by snehk 8mo ago
Not sure how it is in the US but in Germany there are many faith-based entities providing regular health services. Malteser would be one of them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malteser_Hilfsdienst_e.V .
11.
by snehk 9mo ago
Sure but that also means that if women in countries like Afghanistan just weren't so inherently weak, they could enjoy so many more freedoms.
12.
by snehk 11mo ago
Google the following: Friedrich Merz insult – house search (2024) "Pimmel" tweet and Andy Grote complaint (2021) Robert Habeck "Schwachkopf" meme case (2024 / 2025) They're all politicians. Houses were raided i
13.
by snehk 11mo ago
People's homes get raided and their belongings get taken away for daring to insult the ruling class or for making fun of them.
14.
by snehk 1y ago
The poster explained it. The government secretly silencing voices behind closed doors is pretty evil. Or is that only when Russia does it?
15.
by snehk 1y ago
But the things mentioned in the post above yours have nothing to do with telemetry. They're more like core functions to make the system work at all.
16.
by snehk 1y ago
Australia hat a similar situation. They cut that number down to basically zero when they publicly announced that no one entering Australia that way would ever be able to settle in Australia in any way.
17.
by snehk 1y ago
> "7 months of prison for a meme" Quotation marks are usually used if you quote someone. Not if you make up additional things in your head that a person supposedly said.
18.
by snehk 1y ago
https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/nancy-faeser-afd-...
19.
by snehk 1y ago
> Yet to many Europeans the idea that free expression is under threat seems odd. Europeans can say almost anything they want, both in theory and in practice. A journalist in Germany was just sentenced to seven months for posting a meme o
20.
by snehk 2y ago
Neither does the US (President or PM, which they don't have). ;)
21.
by snehk 2y ago
No, it's not good for most people. It's only good for those who rely on welfare programs. It's not sustainable as the money has to come from somewhere. The government has never before seen tax revenue but they still cannot pa
22.
by snehk 2y ago
Because the government continues to expand social welfare programs.
23.
by snehk 2y ago
If others are just as capable, then there's no need to change any of the requirements, right? Why is it happening then?
24.
by snehk 2y ago
And a true Scotsman would know this.
25.
by snehk 2y ago
You cannot trust this article. Just check out the cases where they basically tell poor people that euthanasia is always an option. It's horrible. If they don't talk about where the program goes horribly wrong, we shouldn't li
26.
by snehk 2y ago
> [...] so customers who got screwed need to sue and win individually for the same issue which is favorable for the companies doing the screwing as without the precedent of common law This is factually false. > (some) Rental agreemen
27.
by snehk 2y ago
The whole law should have been forcing sites to not ignore DoNotTrack bworser settings. It's a prime example of the EU being utterly useless because they don't understand the underlying issue and then choose a "solution"
28.
by snehk 2y ago
"Your grandpa/dad was able to support a family on a single income, have two cars, a house and a nice vacation every year and you struggle to pay for food and a place to live? That's a lie. Look at these stats, dummy."
29.
by snehk 2y ago
And if all their demands were met today - or let's say the UK ceases to exist today and doesn't emit anything anymore - how would that impact climate change? Last time I checked the methods of measuring temperature via satellites
30.
by snehk 2y ago
> What I'm really surprised about is how X is still operating in the US or here in Europe. Me too, which is crazy. I remember when news outlets in Europe were complaining about how Russia forbids websites where people could talk fre

More ›