snapplebobapple

5 ms·

1.
by snapplebobapple 3d ago
The other half of it is that it is in the incumbents interest to have these stories because they want the government to regulate ai into an oligopoly of incumbents so they can maximize benefit to themselves and stop new entrants. Ai benefit
2.
by snapplebobapple 4d ago
Well, you got me all wrong. I own one very inexpensive hunting rifle and maybe 3 bullets for it and I haven't touched any of it in about 8 years. I'm not a gun nut, I'm just not a moron. Despite me not practicing what I preac
3.
by snapplebobapple 4d ago
Or if they took all this time to respond because they were busy putting all the stuff they are denying in a second program they called "bcr"
4.
by snapplebobapple 6d ago
So true. The number one risk to your life and liberty is the government. The number 2 is rich guys. Both play a vital role if managed properly and proper management requires copious amounts of instrumenta od violenceto be available to the g
5.
by snapplebobapple 8d ago
Wut? Explain
6.
by snapplebobapple 9d ago
Call up cable tv provuder and say" due to a specific demand by me, i am cancelling my tv service." Then use the time you would have watched tv to lobby to red&ce copyright back to the original 14 years where it probably belong
7.
by snapplebobapple 9d ago
The phone has doomscrolling available which is higher immediate value and negative long term value. I just have to grab this and i am locked into long term value
8.
by snapplebobapple 9d ago
Its pretty good if you can get an opds server going or are ok with dropping bools directly on the sd card. Its small enough that it just stays in my pocket and i read when i have time instead of doom scrolling
9.
by snapplebobapple 10d ago
Seems cheap to me. No way 14 bucks covers collection, transport to a specialized recycling plant and recycling of a panel. We also have a long hiatory of slapping recycling fees on electronics and other thibgs across canada so this doeant s
10.
by snapplebobapple 10d ago
Its more likely that opwnweights models will continue to be not much worse than the propriwtarymodels and just crushes costs. What will stop them feom taking your stuff is the drastically better stuff they are producing with thwir robots an
11.
by snapplebobapple 10d ago
This is kind of a stupid preposition. the cheapest hour should be the cheapest with carbon externalities priced in. There are lots of times where it is both logical and good for the cheapeat hour to not be the lowest carbon (i.e minimum run
12.
by snapplebobapple 11d ago
I ended up getting rid of unbound, stubby, and a technitium instance and just moving to numa.rs everywhere i needed dns. It simplified my life a lot. Now laptops run it with forward*ng that makes sense for their use case (ie home dns to my
13.
by snapplebobapple 16d ago
Ever since i got my x4 and then my x4 pro i d(nt see the allure of these big reasers anymore. Its in my pocket and small enough i foeget a?out it until i need it
14.
by snapplebobapple 17d ago
And that's great, it's just not exciting because the future is linux based, if just for the hardware support. I was hoping for a truenas fork for people annoyed with the truenas closed source/hostility stuff as of late.
15.
by snapplebobapple 18d ago
Was super excited until i saw thatcit was the old freebsd base and not the |inux future
16.
by snapplebobapple 20d ago
Thats easy then. put the condenser in the running toilet
17.
by snapplebobapple 27d ago
I think saying the reason we are unhappy is because the biggest questions are poorly defined misses that happiness was never the goal for why consciousness is here.It's pretty clear to me that consciousness exists for the biology and n
18.
by snapplebobapple 1mo ago
not that relevant. The investment opportunity set is not limited to fossil fuels. Also that report includes large price skewsfor essentially manufactured uncaptured environmental costs, part of which is political in mature to justify subsid
19.
by snapplebobapple 1mo ago
Did this a half decade ago and hacent looked back.
20.
by snapplebobapple 1mo ago
It would be more accurate to say "better investment opportunities bias investment away from the weak returns of allegedly clean energy" capital is not the bottleneck anymore than it has always been the bottleneck. Higher returning
21.
by snapplebobapple 1mo ago
I am trying to figure out if i can afford to make it happen or not lol. Would the labour coat of getting to something good with the support infra be a fewmillion or tens of millions?
22.
by snapplebobapple 1mo ago
How many people are working on this in your couple years example? Is that just one guy or a team of 20 or something else? Whats the average salary for the team *n this scenario?
23.
by snapplebobapple 1mo ago
We got too cautious. They may be too incautious but possibly not given how excessively cautious we are. Caution is good but it needs to be accurately costed and where it cant be we need to error on the side of incaution because the cost of
24.
by snapplebobapple 1mo ago
I am peacing out on this thread because the level of delusion presented in it is beyond curable
25.
by snapplebobapple 1mo ago
good luck making that happen. They are rich because they are highly capable (or their ancestor was and they have enough money to hire as many highly skilled poors as they need to enact their goals). They will find a way to push your attempt
26.
by snapplebobapple 1mo ago
Power users are buying the pebble time 2 because they can modify it to do whatever they want with high sp#cificity
27.
by snapplebobapple 1mo ago
Which part of his politics?
28.
by snapplebobapple 1mo ago
I agree. We should call that "blocking the bads" since the overwhelming majority of things served from that domain are bad.
29.
by snapplebobapple 1mo ago
https://www.impulselabs.com their stove appears to solve all that. I cant wait for their competitors to respond and fix their beyter priced products
30.
by snapplebobapple 1mo ago
thats an excellent way to make your populace poorerand therefore more willing to degrade the en>ironment for a better quality life

More ›