Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
smenko
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
smenko
11y ago
>> ...and just turned 10, has been nagging me for ages to teach him Haskell... I'm guessing you would have taught your human(?) kid some human languages first before he started nagging you (why you, he can read too, right?) to te
2.
▲
by
smenko
11y ago
Is this supposed to be ironic?? Given, you know, the original poster's grievances.... Support Heroes?.. No?
3.
▲
by
smenko
12y ago
Err, no... One is a type construction, the other is function application. It sure helps if these are different...
4.
▲
by
smenko
12y ago
I used to love the physical cabinet I had in the fifties. The sound of it opening, the actual rustle of the paper under your fingers - these _were_ your files, with real letters written on real paper, not some representation of them in a wi
5.
▲
by
smenko
12y ago
80% of the problems I had to deal with (in a live, real-life Clojure system that had to be maintained and supported, not a hobby-happy-slappy-project-thing) were caused by putting square pegs in a round hole. You're telling me I need t
6.
▲
by
smenko
12y ago
Not as an alternative, but as similarly unsafe. It's funny to see how all the Clojure advocates bash Javascript...
7.
▲
by
smenko
12y ago
Oh, god, thanks for reminding me about the whole agent/atom/ref hell - another reason I'd rather erase the whole Clojure experience from my brain altogether...
8.
▲
by
smenko
12y ago
Clojure is horribly unsafe. I spent a year writing Clojure and half the time we were fixing bugs where someone had wrapped a map in another map or changed the shape of a data structure. For all that's worth, I'd rather use Javascr
9.
▲
by
smenko
12y ago
Great, if you want to hire people who "can code", but have no social skills. I am personally done working in environments where people think they "can code" but have not enough of a social skill to at least empathise wit
10.
▲
by
smenko
12y ago
Oh, please! Not another one!.....
11.
▲
by
smenko
12y ago
Err... Money??? Most people will (rightfully) settle for money. Because people need love, and to demonstrate love you need to show that you care, that you're willing to give something up in a hard situation. And the only thing a compan
12.
▲
by
smenko
12y ago
Samsung had this in bla bla....
13.
▲
by
smenko
12y ago
Yes, isUpper is a method on Char, _.isUpper is a lambda that is given to exists, which is a method on the trait TraversableOnce, which String happens to implement, along with many other things, such as Option and Future. Where's the OO
14.
▲
by
smenko
12y ago
Mate, you should learn Scala before writing about it... scala> def hasUppercase(s: String) = s.exists(_.isUpper) hasUppercase: (s: String)Boolean scala> hasUppercase("Charlie Brown") res2: Boolean = true scala> hasUpperca
15.
▲
by
smenko
13y ago
For something containing "the right way" in the heading, this has awful grammar.
16.
▲
by
smenko
13y ago
Oh really? And what makes one Senior? Lead? VP? C-level? COO? CEO? Master? Advanced? Intermediate? Junior? Who decides that? What makes it objective? Can you dispute it if your boss happens to be a bitter idiot who is completely detached fr
17.
▲
by
smenko
13y ago
Is this supposed to be ironic? Considering JSON.parse( {a: "B"} )