smartaz42

7 ms·

1.
by smartaz42 1y ago
I've always thought it odd that the one thing the caller and callee need to agree on are called arguments.
2.
by smartaz42 1y ago
While walking my dog on leash some years back, we were surrounded and stalked by 5 very hungry coyotes (it was a drought year and they were very scrawny) for about 20 minutes. They got increasingly more bold, eventually only just out of kic
3.
by smartaz42 1y ago
FWIW for C only I've used libtcc repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git with great success. The API is a joy, as we all expect from a Bellard project. It focuses on compilation speed, the generated code is not at all optimized.
4.
by smartaz42 1y ago
For me, one of the enjoyable aspects of toy projects is that there is no schedule to meet. Which means that I can take my time. And yes, that means I take much more time than the article implies. As an examine, I've been polishing my P
5.
by smartaz42 1y ago
I haven't personally used it but cosmopolitan claims to provide a simple and portable sandboxing capability
6.
by smartaz42 1y ago
I've found Jason Ricci to be a most useful source as well. Adam Gussow, Tom Leckie, Will Wilde, and Howard Levy all have recommended YouTube content. I haven't checked out the app, but certainly plan to in order to fine tune my sc
7.
by smartaz42 1y ago
Hmm, but speculation is so easy and sampling is anything but. Some of Einstein's speculations were pretty damn productive. The later experiments aka samplings (Einstein proved right again!) were in my view not particularly productive.
8.
by smartaz42 2y ago
What would "south" even mean to flat earther? I can't envision a model in which any sane definition wouldn't lead to a contradiction.
9.
by smartaz42 4y ago
I'm sure that they have outstanding customer support. But you, however, are not the customer.
10.
by smartaz42 4y ago
Redbean (part of the often discussed comopolitan c library) does something like that.
11.
by smartaz42 4y ago
Wouldn't that be SFH?
12.
by smartaz42 5y ago
That grammar simply matches 2^(n-1) a's. Not mind-boggling from that point of view
13.
by smartaz42 5y ago
Hmm, isn't square normally x*x?