sleples

7 ms·

1.
by sleples 3mo ago
Same thing I'm seeing, all the "AI practitioners" at my company with their advanced workflows are just shipping mountains of slop, and end up either putting the actual work on the reviewers, or the poor soul that's on ca
2.
by sleples 3mo ago
OpenAI developers presumably get paid far more than average, so I'd expect better from them, and maybe I'm overrating the average developer, but I can't see a team of average developers struggling with the multitude of ridicu
3.
by sleples 3mo ago
We've gone from "you're holding it wrong" to "the training data was bad because humans suck too". Difference is, humans learn from their mistakes.
4.
by sleples 3mo ago
It's not so simple, especially in the AI slop era. Reviewers are already flooded because people of varying skill opening PRs at a rapid rate and it's not practical to be able to dive deep into every line. It's up to the imple
5.
by sleples 3mo ago
People here genuinely think public perception on AI is a model issue, that's how you know it's become an echo chamber.
6.
by sleples 3mo ago
Part of it is the ridiculous fear-based marketing campaign spearheaded by Anthropic et al. about how AI will automate all jobs and you'll be left behind. Works for enterprise/CEOs, predictably makes regular people hate the mere me
7.
by sleples 4mo ago
Most people I've spoken to in private hate AI in tech too, they just keep quiet out of fear for their job (voice any objection to AI? next on the chopping block), so you only hear the pro AI voices.
8.
by sleples 4mo ago
1. I don't use Claude Code, no. 2. It's amazing that a CLI wrapper is as buggy as it is. 3. Nevertheless, it's useable, and maybe for a CLI that's enough. I don't want a JS runtime running production to be the same
9.
by sleples 4mo ago
I was trying to go against the tide for the longest time by providing detailed reviews, understanding every line of code, leave meaningful comments, improve architecture, etc.. Then management started pushing AI more and more and explicitly