skorisep

7 ms·

1.
by skorisep 6mo ago
This!!! This is exactly where we shine. There is still a lot of work that we have to do (especially on an individual level). But we try to understand as much about an industry, organization, culture, and person as possible to infer those hu
2.
by skorisep 6mo ago
Hahaha. Good question. It was actually inspired by the Sanskrit word referencing time or a unit of time. But it also allows our customers to be lazy :).
3.
by skorisep 7mo ago
Thats absolutely correct @arrsingh. Apologies for the gaps.
4.
by skorisep 7mo ago
Great question! We have a lot of friends in the b2c space. What Vela is designed for is the subset of scheduling where nothing in the market works, specifically for businesses. Think a staffing firm coordinating across candidates, clients,
5.
by skorisep 7mo ago
Thank you very much! We are actually already working with some of the largest US executive search firms (don't have a case study out yet), solving for that exact 'high-touch' scheduling hurdle. If you are ever curious, we wou
6.
by skorisep 7mo ago
Thank you! Awesome question. There are a few factors at play here. One is friction on the other side. With Doodle you're asking someone to click a link, open a UI, parse a grid of times, check boxes, and sometimes connect an account. T
7.
by skorisep 7mo ago
This is awesome! Completely agree: modeling each real life scenario as a constraint satisfaction problem is tricky in and of itself (especially with the diversity of non-intersecting constraints we encounter) and something we are actively w
8.
by skorisep 7mo ago
Absolutely! That's how we view scheduling as a problem as well. Much larger than finding times on calendars and more about coordination of systems and people.
9.
by skorisep 7mo ago
Thank you! That's very interesting and something we are going to double click on. Are you referring to scheduling within a hospital or across hospitals?