skinfaxi

5 ms·

1.
by skinfaxi 3d ago
What's stopping you from slowing down and doing those things even with AI?
2.
by skinfaxi 4d ago
What do you use now?
3.
by skinfaxi 5d ago
And they issue certs in your name, right?
4.
by skinfaxi 5d ago
> I'm really sad that those people keep releasing those tools to other people via cookie-cutter websites filled with misinformation instead of just enjoying them privately Why would that make you really sad? If something scratches y
5.
by skinfaxi 5d ago
I have been feeling an increasing self-imposed pressure to get more done with AI. Similar to the feeling I get when I play factorio too long. It's like the frontier of possibility has radically shifted and I feel almost guilty for not
6.
by skinfaxi 5d ago
Wow how is there not a corewar with LLMs?
7.
by skinfaxi 5d ago
Obligatory xkcd, everything is math. https://xkcd.com/435/
8.
by skinfaxi 5d ago
Wasn't there a purported breach of a huge KYC service, idscan recently? https://www.consumeraffairs.com/news/fbi-investigates-massiv...
9.
by skinfaxi 5d ago
What is the law you are basing your theory?
10.
by skinfaxi 5d ago
Why would the manufacturer of a recording device be liable for its use counter to law?
11.
by skinfaxi 6d ago
I think things like onecli are the direction we will take. The secrets and state will be proxied api calls.
12.
by skinfaxi 6d ago
The title says "freeze a mac".
13.
by skinfaxi 6d ago
> They work terribly for persuasion. I just experienced this in a conversation. An analogy offers an opportunity to engage with the straw man and miss the forest for the trees.
14.
by skinfaxi 6d ago
It has ever been the case that garbage in, garbage out. AI is nothing new in that regard.
15.
by skinfaxi 6d ago
All things being equal, AI actually enables this extremely hyper-personalized kind of gaslighting.
16.
by skinfaxi 6d ago
We really need a new Hanlon's razor for companies. Assume malice over ignorance because groups behave differently than individuals.
17.
by skinfaxi 6d ago
Fundamentally, doesn't gambling require a potential payout that is more valuable than the initial input? If you can only ever get less than you put in that's not really a gamble is it?
18.
by skinfaxi 6d ago
> This may become a case of we don't enforce the laws against large companies. Why would Apple be a party here at all? Would Sony be a party if someone records another with a walkman?
19.
by skinfaxi 6d ago
Any friend or acquaintance that recorded without consent would probably not be in the friend group for much longer. If you don't trust your friends in the first place that seems the like problem to tackle.
20.
by skinfaxi 7d ago
People don't make rational decisions that make rationalized decisions. Is there any thought to pulling your hand off a hot surface?
21.
by skinfaxi 7d ago
In the US at least deaths will outpace births by 2030 so maybe a declining employment rate isn't as bad as it might seem in the long-term.
22.
by skinfaxi 7d ago
The former. Look at cities winding back shotspotter.
23.
by skinfaxi 7d ago
> If these models are such an existential threat to humanity, why are they controlled by two private companies? The government routinely contracts with private companies to create arms and munitions. Or do you think the bombs are deliver
24.
by skinfaxi 8d ago
I personally appreciate very much that this site doesn't have such a feature.
25.
by skinfaxi 9d ago
The patent was filed in 2009 https://patents.google.com/patent/US8246454B2/en
26.
by skinfaxi 9d ago
What's the incentive now and why would that change, in your view?
27.
by skinfaxi 9d ago
It's called the xy problem already.
28.
by skinfaxi 9d ago
Just say the AI did it on its own and you'll be off the hook.
29.
by skinfaxi 10d ago
Why do they say it's white hat hackers?
30.
by skinfaxi 10d ago
That was practically a different era.

More ›