sithlord

5 ms·

1.
by sithlord 2y ago
I would hazard a guess that no one likes ads except the likes of google and meta SHAREHOLDERS).
2.
by sithlord 2y ago
In my world, on my team - everything is a 3. and if its not a 3 lets figure out why. IE, lets have a fairly sized piece of work we scope for most tickets. If its bigger than that, lets discuss it, see if its worht breaking down (if its l
3.
by sithlord 2y ago
Really not sure why the firm is paying fines for this. Seems more like each individual should lose their license.
4.
by sithlord 3y ago
Whats with arbitrary monetary limits?
5.
by sithlord 3y ago
sounds like the ideal PR includes no testing
6.
by sithlord 3y ago
well its historically the highest paying, especially cash, also a lot of tech innovation back when the acronym became a thing.
7.
by sithlord 3y ago
This is usually related to drivers who do not use the cover of their truck they are legally supposed to. So rocks fly out the top.
8.
by sithlord 3y ago
didn't see the email that was posted over the weekend?
9.
by sithlord 3y ago
From what I read, its an independent subsidiary, so in theory keeps the freedom, but I think we all know how that goes over the long haul.
10.
by sithlord 3y ago
>5. Interview and code review session. Bring a side project, show us how it works. So you are filtering out candidates that have families or lives outside of work that do not spend their free time coding?
11.
by sithlord 3y ago
if the final outcome is that everyone will be on strike eventually, the automakers would be wise to just cut to the chase and lock them out until resolved.
12.
by sithlord 3y ago
its generally not, because they fully want to convert you to fte. sure, they have extra time to see you work before the conversion, but its still very expensive to host interns, especially ones you aren't confident in converting.
13.
by sithlord 3y ago
This. It isn't the Doctors responsibility to know all the prices of things and such, they should know what meds you need for your ailment. I would say it would be good if your doctor found out about something (via a pharmaceutical
14.
by sithlord 3y ago
lmao, big name AAA names saying, please dont rate us against this, they have 400 people and 7 years! Then diablo4 credits almost 10k people in making it, and although a fun game, feels like its basically still in beta with all the basic fea
15.
by sithlord 3y ago
20k bonus is a joke of a bonus. probably like < 2-3% of the total comp?
16.
by sithlord 3y ago
> Corporations only speak Money. it seems reddit is already struggling with that piece, so gotta do whatever you can.
17.
by sithlord 3y ago
except their "biggest" competitor, the official app that makes hundreds of requests a minute.
18.
by sithlord 3y ago
they know for probably 75% of the country, imo what should happen: they send a bill of the expected amount, and you do your taxes on your end (if you so choose) to make sure its correct. If wrong, you submit your taxes, and move on with li
19.
by sithlord 3y ago
no results, USA....wild stuff
20.
by sithlord 3y ago
that doesn't matter, you have every bit of information from the board to in theory know every possible outcome. It's not like the opponent can't sneak an extra piece in behind your line. Or randomly turn your rook into thei
21.
by sithlord 3y ago
I think the show Silicon Valley does a good job of portraying that transition.
22.
by sithlord 3y ago
thats why its "the algorithm" not the source of data/truth
23.
by sithlord 3y ago
Wonder if these were managed by a defunct team from India?
24.
by sithlord 4y ago
excessive risk? I mean one could argue that the MBS they bought were slightly risky, but its not like they bought a crap ton of crypto - or bought a bunch of high risk mortgage securities. They got bit by interest rates, which they should
25.
by sithlord 4y ago
I may get downvoted, I may not. But, I am really surprised so many of you all are all about putting likely hundreds of thousands of people out of work. It goes so much further than the "billionaires".
26.
by sithlord 4y ago
I am stating for prior fails, the number from SVB was that only ~3% were insured. Which was my point, that in the past, there wern't as many e(a)ffected (and they (uninsured) could have received special treatment for all I know).
27.
by sithlord 4y ago
My guess ( I havn't looked at is the last ones ) is that the majority of deposits were well under 250k, and that hundreds of thousands of jobs weren't on the line. Also, you are talking about a major banking collapse if people st
28.
by sithlord 4y ago
a bailout, would mean the bank and its shareholders would survive. Making depositors whole is about not having people lose faith in the banking industry.
29.
by sithlord 4y ago
This actually makes a ton of sense, lets not forget that a bailout in this term is really pointing towards saving the bank itself, and its shareholders. There is inherent risk in equity investments, and it likely should have to suffer for
30.
by sithlord 4y ago
I think that there is misconceptions on what most people think as "bailouts". I think what a lot mean is that the usgov should just buy up all the deposit assets, and fund out the money, since its fairly certain that the assets ar

More ›