singulargalaxy

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   The Bias-Variance Trade-off Is Wrong(youtube.com)

   1 points by singulargalaxy 1y ago|0 comments
2. 2.▲
   by singulargalaxy 1y ago

   Perhaps the author should have acknowledged the catalyst for this blog post? https://x.com/andrewgwils/status/1953814226188841417
3. 3.▲
   by singulargalaxy 1y ago

   But it's not a problem, it's actually a good thing that OP's explanation is more general. One of the main points in the OP paper is that you do not in fact need proxies or simplification. You can derive generalization bounds
4. 4.▲
   by singulargalaxy 2y ago

   Yeah, and it's not "better", but actually less general, relying on optimization/GD, unlike OP.
5. 5.▲
   by singulargalaxy 2y ago

   Hard disagree. Your link relies on gradient descent as an explanation, whereas OP explains why optimization is not needed to understand DL generalization. PAC-Bayes, and the other different countable hypothesis bounds in OP also are quite d