sinaa

8 ms·

1.
by sinaa 3mo ago
I iiiioiooo iko to keep up ok it iiiioiooo the same i
2.
by sinaa 3y ago
I really love the idea of "View source" for base prompts. If we simply treat the prompts as frontend / client-side (one could even argue that it can be harder to get the original code from a JS bundle than extract a prompt us
3.
by sinaa 5y ago
The core value of code reviews is knowledge transfer and increased harmony across the codebase. You certainly don't want to work in a codebase riddled with different ways of doing the same thing. Code reviews help with making the patte
4.
BAM15 Reverses Diet-Induced Obesity and Insulin Resistance in Mice(nature.com)
1 points by sinaa 6y ago|0 comments
5.
by sinaa 9y ago
My thoughts exactly. It's impressive that despite relying on BFS, the tool manages to be so fast on a tiny node on google cloud. Even when there's a depth of >= 5 !
6.
by sinaa 9y ago
Great work! Do you simply do a BFS to find the shortest paths? If so, are you doing any tricks to avoid the path explosion problem?
7.
by sinaa 9y ago
You make a very good point on this. As you say, a big win by text is that you can quickly skim it, ignore parts of it that you don't deem to be relevant, and essentially only use the working/short-term memory for the information y
8.
by sinaa 9y ago
Really happy for GitLab and wish you guys all the best (and luck). We've been using Gitlab for all our company's development, however, one major issue that is pushing us to switch over to GitHub is the fact that GitLab goes down a
9.
by sinaa 9y ago
This is both clever and useful! Is it possible to present a resized version of the route to each path underneath each target? (or perhaps show that on hover) I understand that this would mean having overlapping map snippets of different siz
10.
by sinaa 9y ago
Just installed Nightly thinking "how can it be any different from the Developer Edition?" ... Wow, I couldn't be more wrong! It is indeed a night and day experience! More approachable UI, and much faster performance... Big we
11.
by sinaa 9y ago
Thanks for the links. What scares me is that over 1/3 of incidents were marked as "Investigation complete; no suspect identified". And only 18% of attacks (156/833) resulted in a "Charged/Summoned" outcome
12.
by sinaa 9y ago
Compared to 4 ns on Windows, many calls to the method can create significantly different performance profiles across the platforms.
13.
by sinaa 9y ago
App server availability is now 98.3% over the past month, which seems pretty bad!
14.
by sinaa 9y ago
I doubt they'd go for it. Otherwise, this would give a huge boost to Firefox. Chrome's own adblocker would only reduce the incentive to install another adblocker. Especially if it's natively implemented as part of the browser
15.
by sinaa 9y ago
Still, as far as I understand it, it comes down to how good/competent the IT dept is at log-keeping, and how complicit they are in the forgery. In a more broader way, how can one prove innocence if their company use the employee's
16.
by sinaa 9y ago
+ Shrugging-off an act of felony being committed. Nevertheless, it does pose a more general question. Given that in many workplaces the employer has access to your work email/account, how can one prove that he/she did not send a p
17.
by sinaa 9y ago
Maybe by suggesting that you would contact the investors directly to purchase your shares at a slightly discounted rate?
18.
by sinaa 9y ago
I think, while it may not be out of the goodness of Zuckerberg's heart, it's the cost of keeping the Facebook monopoly. That, and the $19B they initially had to fork out.
19.
by sinaa 9y ago
Are these new variants new compiles? Is it possible that multiple variants with randomly-generated kill-switches are being automatically generated?
20.
by sinaa 9y ago
The goal would be to prevent security researchers from preemptively registering all domains the malware connects to. Although it was only a thought, with what `cesarb` mentioned in mind.
21.
by sinaa 9y ago
This may well give birth to a new paradigm: Domain-Driven Programming. Each condition is satisfied by a different domain lookup.
22.
by sinaa 9y ago
This may indeed be exactly what the authors of the next ransomware will do. Two domains, one defuses the ransomware, the other detonates it.
23.
by sinaa 9y ago
This in my opinion is the exact reason. Either they get $50 from users and let them go buy/install off-market, or make the money in the long run from paid app developers who are pressured now to put their applications on the store.
24.
by sinaa 10y ago
Great idea! The following text could be improved though (looks as if it is suggesting to recommend a fake job to a friend): "Is this job ad fake? Report it! or Recommend to a friend"
25.
by sinaa 10y ago
likely using the following pseudo-ish code: # possibly done using a session variable security_questions = [] # first question security_questions.push({question: answer}) # second question security_questions.push({question: ans
26.
by sinaa 10y ago
If they do indeed use end-to-end encryption, there should be nothing to store/learn for Google. Though without it being open source, there's no way to be sure. Unless maybe they start collaborating with Moxie, as Whatsapp did.
27.
by sinaa 10y ago
It seems that a main differentiating feature is also the fact that all calls are end-to-end encrypted. Perhaps as a video-calling alternative to Whatsapp? (given that neither of them are open source)
28.
by sinaa 10y ago
Extremely cool! Now is the reverse (vision->sound) also possible? Perhaps using an array of laser sensors, so that we can reproduce the sounds in the environment. Also, is it possible to turn the images/video back into sound? Could
29.
by sinaa 11y ago
Would be great if you could add an auto-complete on the supported keywords. This way the user could explore and not get disappointed if his/her keywords aren't supported.
30.
by sinaa 11y ago
In hindsight, it would be hilarious (and perhaps even useful?) if the helicopter started running on its feet after landing! Joking aside, given that the legs operate individually, I wonder what happens in case of a failure in one of them, o

More ›