simpleblend

12 ms·

1.
by simpleblend 2y ago
Safe assumption.
2.
by simpleblend 2y ago
https://martinwecke.de/108/#A0E02G2I01O3P2
3.
by simpleblend 2y ago
Not an argument.
4.
Using Shopify and WordPress Together(wpshop.io)
2 points by simpleblend 3y ago|0 comments
5.
by simpleblend 3y ago
You would think that if the world is truly on the brink of devastation, it would be at least worthy of TRYING nuclear power.
6.
by simpleblend 3y ago
This is the key. They don't want the third-world to industrialize.
7.
by simpleblend 3y ago
"The motte-and-bailey fallacy (named after the motte-and-bailey castle) is a form of argument and an informal fallacy where an arguer conflates two positions that share similarities, one modest and easy to defend (the "motte"
8.
by simpleblend 4y ago
Wait, so how is that hate speech?
9.
by simpleblend 4y ago
If you think that's the only piece evidence, I strongly suggest you keep looking. I'm not even a right-winger and it's obvious to me.
10.
by simpleblend 4y ago
The FBI is notoriously subversive, regardless of the political denomination.
11.
by simpleblend 4y ago
Right, so instead of exposing themselves legally they do an end run of telling Twitter to ban and writing smear campaigns. Which is they did to Dr. Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford and Dr. Martin Kulldorff of Harvard.
12.
by simpleblend 4y ago
No. The FBI is prioritizing certain things and not prioritizing others. They're doing this for political reasons, which should outrage everyone. But it doesn't outrage you because you're in agreement with the shit they'r
13.
by simpleblend 4y ago
So Twitter needs to bad them all for you to be convinced?
14.
by simpleblend 4y ago
Stating facts is not hate speech -- especially if you're trying to force society to go along with your unreality for political reasons.
15.
by simpleblend 4y ago
Francis Collins and Fauci specifically targeted those two doctors.
16.
by simpleblend 4y ago
Because leftists often use that as an example of hate speech.
17.
by simpleblend 4y ago
Exactly
18.
by simpleblend 4y ago
So, did you just not read the rest of my comment?
19.
by simpleblend 4y ago
I have a really hard time believing Twitter would have reacted in similar way if an individual or company initiated the same takedowns
20.
by simpleblend 4y ago
1. We're not talking about your company which probably had a different context. We're talking about the FBI telling Twitter to silence opinions and facts. 2. Whether you agree with the LE request has no influence on whether it&#x2
21.
by simpleblend 4y ago
Good point
22.
by simpleblend 4y ago
Exactly. Well put.
23.
by simpleblend 4y ago
Who is saying that people should be harmed? Seriously. Whoever you have in mind, if they're actually advocating violence against people then I'm in agreement with you. That's not cool and they shouldn't be doing that. Ar
24.
by simpleblend 4y ago
Huh? Using the term whataboutism doesn't even make sense here. He asked me to list political speech that was censored, which I did. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford and Dr. Martin Kulldorff of Harvard.
25.
by simpleblend 4y ago
You do realize that it's not the job of the FBI to police 1A speech, especially about an election, right?
26.
by simpleblend 4y ago
It's very convenient that one side of the asile is always in a position to define what hate speech is. Neat trick, but it doesn't work anymore.
27.
by simpleblend 4y ago
How about prominent Stanford and Harvard doctors disagreeing with the Covid polices of the CDC?
28.
by simpleblend 4y ago
You're not seeing the point. The cop was telling the bouncer, "Throw that guy out." And the bar owner did what the cop said, because the police department had threatened to shut down bar owners in the city for the last three
29.
by simpleblend 4y ago
So it's your estimation that both parties were censored an equal amount?
30.
by simpleblend 4y ago
If you run a social media company and the government tells you, "Hey, we want these people banned", and you ban them, is the company "voluntarily" choosing to ban them? Or are they doing it under duress? Of course it&#x2

More ›