sillybov3456

4 ms·

1.
by sillybov3456 4y ago
This is gross
2.
by sillybov3456 4y ago
Respectfully, it's not. Choosing a bank is an aspect of risk management, the act of throwing all your money into whatever thing that calls itself a bank and is most convenient is not risk management, it's risky behavior. Risk mana
3.
by sillybov3456 4y ago
I think based on the parent posts choice to go with the "who is your customer" definition and the fact that we intuitively think of RabbitMQ as some sort of systems program, it probably fits the modern definition of systems progra
4.
by sillybov3456 4y ago
The problem isn't insuring the losses, that they can do. The problem is will you even be able to buy anything after the chaos if a systemically important financial institution goes under? The banks that hold the most ordinary customer
5.
by sillybov3456 4y ago
FDIC insurance is similar in the sense that if the feds ever have to say "don't worry that JP Morgan or <other large consumer facing bank> is going under, most of you will be covered within the FDIC limit", then we&#x27
6.
by sillybov3456 4y ago
I absolutely agree not to get into security and try to stick a little closer to programming, with the same caveat that if you are doing some programming for a security company then maybe it would be a little better.
7.
by sillybov3456 4y ago
That's super interesting, and you're definitely right about the internet thing. I suppose our network guys must have some way to see if a change will propagate beyond a particular interface?
8.
by sillybov3456 4y ago
Right, the thing about root causes is that you can always keep digging. For instance why was an incomplete snapshot shared? And then the why for that why, and on and on until you reach the singularity at the beginning of the universe, which
9.
by sillybov3456 4y ago
That isn't really how production networks work in my uneducated opinion. If they are connected to the production network then they are the production network, and the level of isolation required to make that not the case would be so ex
10.
by sillybov3456 4y ago
The other point of view is that the industry would have been entirely off shored. I think this is particularly a concern in tech, where US workers are notably spoiled even in comparison to the rest of the US. That wasn't the case with
11.
by sillybov3456 4y ago
Atlassian is competing with GitHub and you can't understand why they would ban it?
12.
by sillybov3456 4y ago
Do you run GitHub enterprise on prem? I'm curious because I'm always surprised when I see companies that haven't banned Microsoft server GitHub. Seems like a massive risk.
13.
by sillybov3456 4y ago
It also massively reduces their potential customer base in all the industries that are typically more resilient to recession.
14.
by sillybov3456 4y ago
I'm sorry but I'm not entirely sure who or what you are responding to with this. Could you explain a little bit of the context so that we can understand the point that is being made?
15.
by sillybov3456 4y ago
I think it can but I wouldn't call it a miracle. The "boomer bulge" in the workforce is in the process of entering retirement en masse. The generations replacing them are smaller. This will contribute to higher inflation (lot
16.
by sillybov3456 4y ago
Its peak hacker news to come up with a term like "legacy industry".
17.
by sillybov3456 4y ago
This is all based on a myth though, primarily the myth that "only COBOL" developers are a common thing (people believe this for COBOL even though it's never really been a thing for other languages, wasn't even ever reall