Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
silentpuck
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
Yes, it's much easier directly in Telegram. Many people are already familiar with in-chat payments, and for users behind censorship, Telegram often feels safer and more accessible than opening websites with unknown crypto gateways.
2.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
You might want to consider adding a Telegram-based payment bot. For users in China, Iran, or Russia, this could be much more practical than navigating obscure web wallets or exchanges.
3.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
I don’t want to sound discouraging, but I’ll be honest. First of all, you need to figure out what you really want and what you’re willing to do to get there. Some people mentioned starting your own project above. I think that’s a really gr
4.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
Haha, nope — just me. I guess that's my inner ex-humanities student showing through. Sometimes I write in bursts, get carried away with the rhythm, and then end up editing like crazy to make it all make sense. Em-dashes are just my way
5.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
Yeah, that’s a fair point. Abstraction is part of progress — and we do rely more and more on things “just working.” But that trust can be dangerous when we don’t even know what we’re trusting. And when something breaks, it can leave us comp
6.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
Yes, I think many people are starting to feel this exact tension. The key, I believe, is to mentally reframe the AI: it's not the driver, it's your assistant — a helper, a debugger, maybe even a silent teacher. But you're sti
7.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
I think the real sadness is that many developers may stop learning the deeper fundamentals — the things that AI can't replace. When people start relying on the "I just want it to work this way" mentality and let AI take over,
8.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
Absolutely fair. If I needed to ship a product quickly and prove something to investors or customers, I would choose a higher-level language too. For me, C programming is not about speed, it's about deep understanding, intention, and c
9.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
That’s a really insightful way to put it. I think you're right — being in the driver seat gives one kind of experience, but leading a team under pressure is a different challenge entirely. I guess every generation of developers finds t
10.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
That actually sounds really cool. Being able to run C# like a script lowers the friction a lot. Thanks again.
11.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
I really appreciate you sharing that journey — it reads like a personal history of programming. I’ve heard others mention the elegance of Turbo Pascal and Delphi, especially the string handling. And yes — C macros and pointer syntax can abs
12.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
Exactly. That’s how I feel too — writing small, precise tools in C by myself is strangely rewarding. Thanks for sharing that — it’s good to know others feel it too.
13.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
I use LLMs mostly for learning and understanding. When a book doesn’t explain something clearly, I ask for a deeper explanation — with examples, and sometimes exercises. It’s like having a quiet teacher nearby who never gets frustrated if I
14.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
It’s true — programming languages spark some of the fiercest debates. Everyone wants to defend the one that speaks to them. That’s why it’s been such a pleasure having this kind of conversation — thoughtful, respectful, and grounded. Thanks
15.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
That’s a great point — C# really does hit a sweet spot between control and convenience. I’ve never spent serious time with it, but I’ve heard a lot of good things about the tooling and the ecosystem. Maybe one day I’ll give it a try — espec
16.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
I usually just give it to someone who needs it. It's amazing how even a “useless” item can become useful in the right hands.
17.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
Yeah, I think you’re right — Python really shines in many areas. Honestly, a lot comes down to the person, the kind of problems they solve, their mindset… and sometimes, their scars. I don’t even fully know why Python didn’t click with me.
18.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
Thanks — I actually plan to start learning assembler this fall. Not for pain, but for deeper understanding. Step by step, I want to get closer to what’s really going on.
19.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
I’ve heard similar thoughts from others who went into Rust expecting something radically freeing — and found themselves wrestling with the borrow checker and unexpected heap usage. I still want to explore Rust at some point, but I think it’
20.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
That’s a really fair question. For me, it’s not just about building tools — it’s about understanding what I’m building. I like knowing where the bytes go. What the memory looks like. How the binary behaves. It slows me down, sure — but it t
21.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
I’m really glad to hear that. It’s easy to feel alone in that view these days — but the more I talk to people who build things close to the metal, the more I realize we’re not as rare as it seems. I remember trying Python once — it didn’t c
22.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
Yeah, the stack can be such a headache. I remember how much pain I went through just trying to wrap my head around it — even gave up a few times. But then I’d cool down… and come back to it. Some languages just never “clicked” for me, but s
23.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
That’s fascinating. I never thought Java could get that close without tripping on GC. Must’ve taken a lot of careful design and deep understanding. I’d honestly love to read more about setups like that — maybe in my quiet hours. Feels like
24.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
That’s deeply encouraging to hear — thank you. I often doubt myself when I see all the modern hate for C, but hearing from someone who used it when cycles mattered… That means a lot. I hope to earn that same kind of precision.
25.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
I truly appreciate the depth of your response. I can see that it comes from long experience and serious thought. I don’t claim to be immune to the sharp edges of C. I’ve already cut myself more than once. Maybe I’m bleeding now and don’t ev
26.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
Yeah, I agree — sometimes you can really run into that and spend a lot of time handling errors. Java is also a great language. I get why it clicked for you.
27.
▲
by
silentpuck
1y ago
I think that's the beauty of C — it lets you fit logic into 32kB without screaming. For me it's not about "modern safety" — it's about knowing that every byte is mine. But yeah, I get the tradeoff when you’ve got te
28.
▲
Ask HN: Why do so many developers dislike C when I find it inspiring?
12 points
by
silentpuck
1y ago
|
41 comments
29.
▲
Show HN: SilentGPT – Terminal ChatGPT Client in C (AES-256, No Telemetry)
(github.com)
3 points
by
silentpuck
1y ago
|
0 comments
30.
▲
Show HN: SilentArena – Learn ransomware behavior safely (C-based)
(github.com)
1 points
by
silentpuck
1y ago
|
0 comments
More ›