Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
shreyasonline
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
shreyasonline
1y ago
Oops! https://blog.technitium.com/2015/05/technitium-bit-chat-rele... I had released that 10 yrs ago lol.
2.
▲
by
shreyasonline
3y ago
Sure, but its not what pi-hole does or support. You need to install another software and forward requests to it. Technitium DNS has this feature built-in along with support for DoT and DoQ, including support for DoH/3.
3.
▲
by
shreyasonline
3y ago
If you are looking for self hosting local resolver then just make sure its not accessible from public Internet. If you wish to host your own authoritative DNS server for your domain names then just configuring query rate limiting will mitig
4.
▲
by
shreyasonline
3y ago
Its actually much more beneficial to use a local DNS server even for a single user. A single user will keep querying for DNS requests since OS/apps cache DNS only for a minute or so. Local DNS will keep cache for the full TTL of the re
5.
▲
by
shreyasonline
3y ago
It does what pi-hole does and a lot more. Has encrypted DNS protocols like DNS-over-HTTPS, DNS-over-TLS, and DNS-over-QUIC support and also has built-in recursive resolver.
6.
▲
For DNSSEC and Why Dane Is Needed
(blog.technitium.com)
4 points
by
shreyasonline
3y ago
|
0 comments
7.
▲
by
shreyasonline
3y ago
It seems you have not kept up with .NET development. Web Forms have been obsolete since many years by now.
8.
▲
How to Host Your Own DNS-over-HTTPS and DNS-over-TLS Services
(blog.technitium.com)
1 points
by
shreyasonline
6y ago
|
0 comments
9.
▲
by
shreyasonline
7y ago
Same can be said about IP-based blocking that firewalls employ. IP-based blocking can also be bypassed by using various tunneling techniques but that does not make it useless. Having DNS based control in addition to IP-based control is much
10.
▲
by
shreyasonline
7y ago
Why DoH and not DoT? DoT be much more suitable and provides same set of guarantees since both are essentially using TLS. DoH provides only one extra thing that is to make it difficult to block. If you run DoT over port 443 then it essential
11.
▲
by
shreyasonline
7y ago
"The major criticism of DoH is Firefox enabling it by default and overriding the existing system DNS configuration, requiring manual reconfiguration of arbitrarily many client devices to change it back to the way it was. There can obvi
12.
▲
by
shreyasonline
7y ago
"Is security policy via DNS really a good way to go? There are other, imo more effective, ways of handling this. If your security policy can be defeated by using a DoH resolver, it’s evidently not very hard to bypass." Same argume
13.
▲
Analyzing DNS-over-HTTPS and DNS-over-TLS Privacy and Security Claims
(blog.technitium.com)
50 points
by
shreyasonline
7y ago
|
66 comments
14.
▲
by
shreyasonline
7y ago
DoH and DoT are not really providing privacy unless ESNI is fully developed and deployed by most websites. DoT and DoH do provide security since with plain old DNS, literally anyone in your network path can spoof responses. Round robin prov
15.
▲
Turn Raspberry Pi into Network Wide DNS Server
(blog.technitium.com)
1 points
by
shreyasonline
8y ago
|
0 comments
16.
▲
Quick and Easy Guide to Install .NET Core on Raspberry Pi
(blog.technitium.com)
1 points
by
shreyasonline
8y ago
|
0 comments
17.
▲
Configuring DNS-Over-TLS and DNS-Over-HTTPS with Any DNS Server
(blog.technitium.com)
4 points
by
shreyasonline
8y ago
|
0 comments
18.
▲
Blocking Internet Ads Using DNS Sinkhole
(blog.technitium.com)
3 points
by
shreyasonline
8y ago
|
0 comments
19.
▲
Configuring DNS Server for Privacy and Security with DNS-Over-TLS/DNS-Over-HTTPS
(blog.technitium.com)
1 points
by
shreyasonline
8y ago
|
0 comments
20.
▲
by
shreyasonline
11y ago
another annoying thing about PHP is that it keeps emitting warning related INFO messages on webpage for visitors to see even after having proper try{}catch{} error handling. Then you got use set_error_handler for it to suppress unwanted mes