shkkmo

7 ms·

1.
by shkkmo 4d ago
> If victims of traffic were made whole then car insurance would be staggeringly expensive and either (1) only extremely rich people would afford to drive or (2) a ton of un-insured drivers would be out on the roads. This seems like kind
2.
by shkkmo 5d ago
Depending on the facts of the case they could indeed be convicted of a crime. There was a infamous case recently where a woman was convicted of criminally negligent homicide due to owning a dangerous dog that killed a kid. https:/&#x2
3.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
I had a very negative view toward toll roads untill I found the Road Guy Rob youtube channel. His video on the Oklahoma toll roads completely changed my perspective. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EzPPmiKFf5I
4.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
> we don't want to start to treat digital device and software as living beings. Right, because then we have to decide at what point our use of AI becomes slavery.
5.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
I'm polite in repose to being repeatedly called names and this is your response? If you think my behavior here was truly ban worthy than do it because I don't see anything in the I would change except for engaging at all
6.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
> What kind of bullshit argument is this? Really? Works created using illegally obtained copyrighted material are themselves considered to be infringing as well. That isn't true. The copyright to derivative works is owned by the cop
7.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeroelasticity#Flutter
8.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
[flagged]
9.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
> You seem set on conflating "training" an LLM with "learning" by a human. "Learning" is an established word for this, happy to stick with "training" if that helps your comprehension. > LLMs don
10.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
> The problem is that it's not the user of the LLM doing the reproduction, the LLM provider is. I don't think this is legally true. The law isn't fully settled here, but things seem to be moving towards the LLM user being
11.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
This is a stance that violates tha guidelines of HN. > Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith. https://news.ycombinato
12.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
You keep conflating different things. > We have evidence of LLMs reproducing code from github that was never ever released with a license that would permit their use. We know this is illegal. What is illegal about it? You are allowed to
13.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
> If I had a photographic memory and I used it to replicate parts of GPLed software verbatim while erasing the license, I could not excuse it in court that I simply "learned from" the examples. Right, because you would have don
14.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
> You’re conflating ideas to make a point I am talking specifically about the ideas you are disputing: >> partially signed off to corporate entities who are more than happy to consent away their access into our effects. I haven&#x2
15.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
> you will have no problem citing a huge count of cases where lawyers do not respect their obligations towards the courts and their clients... There are almost 2000 disbarments annually in the US. The california bar recieves 1 compliant
16.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
And it is still a lock if it was just hanging there and not actually locked as in this case.
17.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
Amazon's echo and other such IoT devices do extend this to "houses" but isn't quite as ubiquitous.
18.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
> judge's reduction it to a book equivalence is misleading and weakens the judgement Good thing that isn't what happened. It is called an "analogy" and is not a factual statement of equivalence.
19.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
> None of my house, papers, or effects are owned by anyone but myself. Do you self host your own email? No? Those are "papers" that your email hosting provider can consent to providing law enforcement access to without a warran
20.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
Perhaps if you had examples or decisions to explain what you're talkinh about, you would make your point better? As is, you are being politely called out as incorrect because you are asserting someone people don't believe and not
21.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
I guess that's why most computer games don't have NPCs...Oh wait there's entire computer games built entirely around interacting with synthetic NPCs. There are, of course, limitations to synthetic characters. Even with those
22.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
> Usually HN univocally complains about Apple‘s dominant App Store. There is a strong population on HN that dislikes walled gardens. In my experience there are also plenty of people who disagree. There's also a large population that
23.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
It's so obvious that I stated it in my comment...
24.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
I can't quite follow your comment. If you have a predetermined number of things that can be "searched" for, that is a filter box, not a search box. Even if you want to stretch the semantics and call it a search box, it is sti
25.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
> There’s little reason to avoid prescribing medication alongside other approaches. There absolutely are downsides and risks. There is a reason the SSRIs carry a "blackbox" warning for youths due to increased suicide risks. Th
26.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
A routine request for information is not shutting down a merger and presenting it as such is not good faith communication.
27.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
The standard invoker commands deal with the display of already loaded page content in the DOM. HTMX deals with loading content into the DOM, not managing display of the DOM. They serve two different roles and together should handle the majo
28.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
> The article has a lot about how they're struggling for money. Not really. The closest it comes is briefly mentioning some 2024 layoffs. What the article is discussing is revenue diversification. > Which is a constant issue for
29.
by shkkmo 9mo ago
The HDMI Forum isn't "most people", it's a non-profit run by some of the largest companies in the space that self describes this way.[1] I think it is reasonable to complain when "someone" is being so hypocriti
30.
by shkkmo 10mo ago
[flagged]

More ›