Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
shishy
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
shishy
1mo ago
Do you think it's impossible for someone to have a 25K line PR / diff but not know what's going on in the system? I ask because I've pushed some of this to the limit in my own testing and when I get the right building bl
2.
▲
by
shishy
2mo ago
> In fact, the most dangerous model may be one that is trained in secret and handed only to the People’s Liberation Army for use in drones and the Ministry of State Security for surveillance and repression. Aren't Anthropic models u
3.
▲
by
shishy
3mo ago
yeah. they could have called it Medjourney.
4.
▲
2026 Cosmos HAI Lab Lecture with Jack Clark, Co-Founder of Anthropic [video]
(youtube.com)
1 points
by
shishy
4mo ago
|
0 comments
5.
▲
We Are Not Language Machines
(shishyko.com)
1 points
by
shishy
5mo ago
|
0 comments
6.
▲
Serendipity Machines
(shishyko.com)
2 points
by
shishy
5mo ago
|
0 comments
7.
▲
by
shishy
5mo ago
This must be the Opus 4.7 constitution
8.
▲
by
shishy
5mo ago
i used to watch this on repeat when i was a kid. it makes for a great christmas movie these days :)
9.
▲
The Possessed Machines: Dostoevsky's Demons and the Coming AGI Catastrophe
(possessedmachines.com)
27 points
by
shishy
8mo ago
|
3 comments
10.
▲
by
shishy
9mo ago
Hi - the opportunity space page is meant to be broad; a more specific and targeted programme thesis within that is going to come out in the coming months. I should mention that it's not just a call for technical solutions because, as y
11.
▲
by
shishy
9mo ago
The idea that the future is architected by our choices (or lack of it) is the crux of one of the opportunity spaces at the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) in the UK. Worth getting on your radar if this stuff is of interesting:
12.
▲
by
shishy
9mo ago
People are probably copy pasting already without that disclosure :(
13.
▲
by
shishy
1y ago
> It was easy to swallow that failure. I made an honest mistake; I expect companies to reject candidates who make honest mistakes during interviews. what a ridiculous statement
14.
▲
by
shishy
1y ago
Yes well bubbles are a core part of the innovation process (new tech being useful doesn't imply a lack of bubbles), see e.g."Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital" by Carlota Perez https://en.wikipedia.or
15.
▲
The Bazaar of Scientific Knowledge
(shishyko.com)
3 points
by
shishy
1y ago
|
0 comments
16.
▲
by
shishy
1y ago
I agree with you but there's something ironic about seeing that comment here, especially considering how many jobs tech has replaced in the last few decades without people having the time to retrain.
17.
▲
by
shishy
1y ago
They probably meant a "once in a generation" startup like a unicorn
18.
▲
A New Scientific Operating System
(shishyko.com)
2 points
by
shishy
1y ago
|
0 comments
19.
▲
by
shishy
1y ago
Yes, it depends on what you're doing; for general paper discovery / search tasks, title abstract can be enough (which is also why Springer and Elsevier have been pulling even their abstracts from sources like OpenAlex). But for so
20.
▲
by
shishy
1y ago
grobid is a wonderful resource, patrice did an awesome job (I used it at my previous job at scite.ai)
21.
▲
by
shishy
1y ago
I always say that Iowa City is the Paris of the Midwest ;). Except when there's a home game. The art culture is incredible. Two of our favorite artists spent a considerable amount of time there, so we made a few trips when researching
22.
▲
by
shishy
1y ago
There is craft in business, in product, and in engineering. A lot of these discussions focus on craft in engineering and there's lots of merit there regarding AI tools and how they change that process, but I've found that folks wh
23.
▲
by
shishy
1y ago
You think it's a two way door, but the one behind you will close shut and you'll realize it was a one way door once someone says: "but 48 hours wasn't enough to evaluate it" ;)
24.
▲
by
shishy
1y ago
> If there's a structural ratchet mechanism, where outsourcing a particular kind of manufacturing work means the US can never do it effectively again, doesn't every tick of the ratchet pose significant risks? Yes, and in an ear
25.
▲
American Disruption
(stratechery.com)
239 points
by
shishy
1y ago
|
200 comments
26.
▲
by
shishy
2y ago
Thanks all for reaching out; we found someone! I love HN. If you see this way later and are interested, of course feel free to write me a note. You never know :)
27.
▲
by
shishy
2y ago
Yep. It was a little shocking when I learned that about HCB a while ago. Totally agree.
28.
▲
by
shishy
2y ago
The interesting part of her work is that unlike other photographers who not only took photos but had the chance to edit them, someone else discovered a bunch of negatives she left behind. So others came in later to turn them into what you s
29.
▲
by
shishy
2y ago
Portal Stargaze | Fractional Engineer | Part time, 10-20 hours/week, $100-$150/hr (potentially full-time later) | Remote -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
30.
▲
by
shishy
2y ago
I figured those contracts with an intermediary would extend to anyone they re-sell to, or prohibit them from re-selling...
More ›