shif

6 ms·

1.
by shif 9y ago
Can't they fine the strawberrynet blatant disregard for privacy?, It's based on the UK, you can access personal information of anyone registered in the site with only their email address and they say It's not a big deal.
2.
by shif 9y ago
But you can, a simple reverse proxy can let the same port be used for multiple servers and pick based on hostname or query (for http). reverse proxies like nginx also have plain tcp support so it allows you to easily run several services
3.
by shif 9y ago
That's the blogger platform
4.
by shif 9y ago
What if one of the people that has part of the key gets mad and leaves without sharing it?
5.
by shif 9y ago
An ex admin would probably have access to the physical backups too, this could have been done before he left the company.
6.
by shif 9y ago
The government could force pc manufacturers to deploy a root CA that they control and then do a MITM proxy to read everything the user is doing, they could also redirect wikipedia domain to another domain that just acts as a reverse proxy a
7.
by shif 9y ago
It's sophisticated because of it's simplicity and effectiveness.
8.
by shif 9y ago
It's headless so most likely yes.
9.
by shif 9y ago
https://www.cvedetails.com/product/2387/Drupal-Drupal.html?v...
10.
by shif 9y ago
HTTPS isn't bulletproof either, the argument could still be made with TLS
11.
by shif 9y ago
chrome://net-internals/#hsts doesn't seem to show anything for the domain
12.
by shif 9y ago
That's regressive as fuck, it's like saying that cars will no longer be allowed, only horse carriages
13.
by shif 9y ago
Ctrl + Shift + J in chrome
14.
by shif 9y ago
You should see the other companies that hold /8's apple for example owns 17.0.0.0/8 and barely uses any of their 16 million addresses
15.
by shif 9y ago
I wonder how the domain displays on email clients like gmail and outlook, this is the scariest part, most people will just look at the domain and think it's a valid mail and follow the instructions of that mail, it could be catastrophi