shevy

6 ms·

1.
by shevy 9y ago
Very unlikely - I am sure you can be identified too. Either way it is ethically questionable. Another example of how evil mozilla has become.
2.
by shevy 9y ago
This is not bad - Mozilla employees can then be put in prison. It's also one way to do away with mozilla.
3.
by shevy 9y ago
It's not "kinda shitty" - it is an act of betrayal by mozilla. The company once known to care about user privacy, now u-turned and works against you. The sooner mozilla dies, the better. It has become evil - not as evil as go
4.
by shevy 9y ago
Now mozilla totally lost it. I realized a few months ago that mozilla is run by google drones, so it no longer surprises me that mozilla kills itself. But the level of stupidity is amazing. I think the people who work there are deliberately
5.
by shevy 9y ago
I don't like the name. For those who don't know german, Jaeger is "Jäger" is hunter/ranger. A somewhat neutral term in itself but there is also a slight, somewhat remote connection towards some part of the history (
6.
by shevy 9y ago
Many twitch streamers prefer patreon. I have no idea; just stating that I noticed it when watching some twitch events.
7.
by shevy 9y ago
Yeah. They have now become dependent on external decision makers. I wonder if we'll have to read notes such as "how patreon was once great" ... before a sell-out to some other company will happen. However had, that being said
8.
by shevy 9y ago
Unfortunately I fear that Google has become too big for the whole world and will slurp up everything that can be a competition, just like they slurped up youtube too at one point in time. And we all know that money moves people, so there is
9.
by shevy 9y ago
Pretty nice success story. Unfortunately money changes the way how companies work - and often not to the better.
10.
by shevy 9y ago
Well said. More monopoly control by a company that has already gotten way too big for the world to (want to) swallow.
11.
by shevy 9y ago
But we did not have AMP until recently. So OTHERS made a new decision for YOU - as the visitor.
12.
by shevy 9y ago
Oh wow, I did not even notice this until you pointed it out. So the solution is SO bad that the "amp" tag even becomes part of the URL?! Now THAT is really weird ... well aside from me disliking AMP anyway, that ... hmmm. We can s
13.
by shevy 9y ago
They moved most of their stuff away from AWS.
14.
by shevy 9y ago
> While cost is always something that we consider, our > goal with our network expansion was to improve > performance, reliability, flexibility and control > for our users — which we have succeeded in doing,” > a company spo
15.
by shevy 9y ago
There are already certain laws that prohibit certain content. But this is not the issue in this case; neither are ISIS propaganda videos. This here is corporate and state-controlled censorship that has no legal basis at all whatsoever aimed
16.
by shevy 9y ago
Very true. But it gets even worse when you look at lobbyists paid by corporations. In the long run, Google will have to be split up into smaller pieces. You can't control this evil - and greedy -corporation otherwise anymore.
17.
by shevy 9y ago
Well, no surprise - ever since Google turned fully evil, it has been working against mankind. It's a wonderful opportunity to stop using Google-related products and feed more evilness into Google.
18.
by shevy 9y ago
See here for someone abandoning archlinux in favour of voidlinux: http://halestrom.net/darksleep/blog/005_distrohop_p1/ Note that the primary impetus was actually not necessarily that archlinux has degraded i
19.
by shevy 9y ago
Are you really reasoning in favour of some obscure program rather than a simple "ln -s"? Dude, we have been using *nix since decades. There is nothing wrong with keeping things simple - no need for systemd whatsoever.
20.
by shevy 9y ago
yo people - you guys really need to handle slashes properly! They are quite important for www-stuff you know. "a majority of the OCSP requests we were receiving were prepended with a slash" Everything is unsafe - one has to make s
21.
by shevy 10y ago
Precisely. "The Ruby community even has their own acronym for being nice to other developers: MINASWAN" No, that is not true. That was coined, if I remember correctly, by the pickaxe. Matz is nice, but how does this translate to a
22.
by shevy 18y ago
Also I would like you to name which library specifically causes this problem :) Whenever I read it, people seem to make up contrived problems - and do not give any example. I would like specific examples please where this interferes with yo
23.
by shevy 18y ago
You can use ruby without gems. I think you confuse gems with "pure" ruby as such. I have seen horribly code in gems and I think the whole gems idea is the wrong solution. But I am in a minority here. I also do not know why cpan is mentiond
24.
by shevy 18y ago
This comment field is not very good, it killed my newlines! :( I demand the pre tag or a "code" tag or something that allows us to add code nicely formatted :P
25.
by shevy 18y ago
Looks contrived, because I dont know many ruby users who would write fun1 for a method. Why? Because in ruby there are methods. You dont find many people doing "fun" for a method - the intent clearly was a "function". But where are they? ;)
26.
by shevy 18y ago
One thing I dont understand is print word where does "word" come from? Anyway, this setup is in no way different to ruby's super super("foo") super("bar") I really fail to see the point here. What is different? I simply do not see what the
27.
by shevy 18y ago
No it is not. You dodged the question again, by throwing a hardly related blog of someone else at it. How many people will use yield _AND_ self.send in the same method please?! That seems like an awfully complicated and contrived example. W
28.
by shevy 18y ago
"the fact that they necessitate a special form (yield) and cannot be bound to a variable, and are not passed as standard function parameters just makes them inconsistent and gross." Which brings us to another point - when exactly do you act