shadilay

6 ms·

1.
by shadilay 4y ago
This is completely false. They just did a die shrink to make the CPU/GPU cheaper. https://www.tomshardware.com/news/playstation-5-refresh-boas...
2.
by shadilay 4y ago
The north africans of roman times have almost nothing in common with the modern arab north africans. The Carthaginians in north africa during roman times were more similar to modern Portuguese. https://www.heritagedaily.com/
3.
by shadilay 5y ago
Furthermore refining old battery material into new feedstock is far less energy intensive than getting it out of the ground in the first place.
4.
by shadilay 5y ago
I tend to think if the government is paying to develop new drugs they might as well do the manufacturing too.
5.
by shadilay 5y ago
I don't have any direct knowledge but those kind of solutions create security problems. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RemoteFX#RemoteFX_vGPU_Depreca... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPU_virtua
6.
by shadilay 5y ago
Unlike oil you can recycle lithium. There is only so many new batteries needed and at some point most of the demand will be fed with recycled lithium.
7.
by shadilay 5y ago
I think titles such as this do much damage to society by carving out separate 'us and them' spheres when in reality everyone generally has philosophical overlap with anyone else. We can disagree on the whole while finding agreemen
8.
by shadilay 5y ago
They're not that mature software wise due to the fact that hardly anyone uses them. Microsoft may save us here because Virtualization Based Security has to be enabled to sell an OEM PC with a Win11 sticker. Doing GPU virtualization in
9.
by shadilay 5y ago
Nvidia no longer throws error 43 on new drivers. AMD cards before the 6000 series also have a PCIe reset bug which forces you to reboot the host.
10.
by shadilay 5y ago
You could say the Same about non IOMMU CPU virtualization. The problem here is AMD and Nvidias disgusting greed that has held back security by at least a decade. GPU virtualization (vGPU/MxGPU) is supported but only if you pay ridiculo
11.
by shadilay 5y ago
It's more nuanced than that. In America calls for raising taxes are usually in the name of some public good, eg infrastructure. How true that is is up to personal interpretation. In China it's purely about power, namely removing a
12.
by shadilay 5y ago
'Common Prosperity' seems to mean that there are too many rich people in China that are giving too little money to the central government as their wealth usurps the power of the CCP.
13.
by shadilay 5y ago
I like everything about this. Hopefully hardware support will catch up to the Qubes vision in regards to virtualized GPU resources.
14.
by shadilay 5y ago
When it comes to IoT, never ask how bad things can be for they will surely be worse than you can possibly imagine.
15.
by shadilay 5y ago
When did they do this? I reset my cartidge last year.
16.
by shadilay 5y ago
I can't think of any scenario where it would be wise to give an IoT device your credit card.
17.
by shadilay 5y ago
That sounds like a way to punish malicious committers rather than prevent malicious commits.
18.
by shadilay 5y ago
There is always a problem when you have to apply one set of standards globally. Ideally there would be far more censorship but it would only affect decentralized communities of ~150. Smaller groups can set rules to suit themselves, less so
19.
by shadilay 5y ago
Are you saying that an institution has to market itself to potential customers in order to exist and has to follow them to where they are? The aim here is to develop interoperability so users have the option of thousands of networks without
20.
by shadilay 5y ago
Context is dead because AI content moderation is infinitely cheaper than human moderation. It's time to end the tyranny of centralized services.
21.
by shadilay 5y ago
Considering how many outlets have covered this phenomenon and the dearth of videos of it you can find in the dark parts of the internet I'd say it's completely true. Downvoting doesn't make it false either. https:/&#x2F
22.
by shadilay 5y ago
I imagine they'll be programmed to run over a pedestrian twice if they hit one. 'Driven to Kill - Why drivers in China intentionally kill the pedestrians they hit.' https://slate.com/news-and-politics/20
23.
by shadilay 5y ago
Better but less obvious.
24.
by shadilay 5y ago
I've yet to see an instagram model 'influencer' doing a pose and advertising ivermectin.
25.
by shadilay 5y ago
Usually isn't much good if you let something like thalidomide slip through.
26.
by shadilay 5y ago
I would certainly understand that argument if the individuals involved benefited financially from HCQ or ivemectin being used. It seems these are generic drugs however with relatively low margins so that line of thinking isn't very con
27.
by shadilay 5y ago
Not necessarily. While Epic has an interest in selling unreal they would also benefit from people selling godot games on their store.
28.
by shadilay 5y ago
The distinction I was making was between laws that are enforced an those that are not.
29.
by shadilay 5y ago
You accuse me of being a conspiratorial thinker? Please do not resort to ad hominem when I have provided you ample evidence. The NMB wikipedia article describes the process airline pilots unions must follow before being allowed to strike. T
30.
by shadilay 5y ago
It won't. There are already people using AI image recognition running on a separate PC to aimbot.

More ›