sfashset

7 ms·

1.
by sfashset 4y ago
> It seems like they are on a better track to profitability if their revenue rebounds a bit - i.e. if they get up to 80% of their previous revenue they will be operating that level of revenue with underlying profitably rather than operat
2.
by sfashset 4y ago
This is fake news, based on a misunderstanding of how twitter remediation works: https://twitter.com/passantino/status/1586012602274140163
3.
by sfashset 4y ago
Again, you are just mistaken - I'm not sure if this is a tech industry coping mechanism, or what. General practitioners are in the above dataset, and make an amount comparable to an L5 Google SWE. If you want to make an argument that t
4.
by sfashset 4y ago
Sorry but you’re completely wrong about both your 5 years comment and your income range. For a more realistic look at physician income see https://www.offerdx.com/
5.
by sfashset 4y ago
Yeah what makes this story interesting is that these emails and leak are (largely) fabricated. See https://twitter.com/swodinsky/status/1579847763499847681?s=4... another giveaway is the missing article in the hea
6.
by sfashset 4y ago
The Axios article links the SpaceX letter to Elon "slowing down" on Twitter - but the event that correlates to the hard stop is Elon's oldest child publicly transitioning gender and changing their last name.
7.
by sfashset 5y ago
he's a SDE at Amazon
8.
by sfashset 6y ago
I have a lot of troubling squaring your statement > Instead of a high-stakes and all-too-often arbitrary interview every single time you want to change jobs, you could prove your basic competence to practice through an exam, and elect to
9.
by sfashset 6y ago
Getting into any US med school is definitely harder than getting into FAANG. [0] Part of it is things like the MCAT and organic chemistry are hard, part of it is there's a whole "hidden" component of med school applications r
10.
by sfashset 6y ago
link to his Amazon reviews page?
11.
by sfashset 6y ago
This is an interesting post in that it’s complaint is totally different than the usual gripes we see about interviewing on HN. I totally expected to see complaints about DS+A style questions, some discussion about how leetcode is useless fo
12.
by sfashset 6y ago
The amount of dues given is entirely optional. 1% is a recommended amount and not enforced.
13.
by sfashset 6y ago
If you're the one copy pasting code, aren't you the cookie cutter software engineer?
14.
by sfashset 6y ago
The quoted text is just a journalist trying to use a cute metaphor. Anyway, here are two Bay Area journalists who discussed this a few years ago when this topic first came up: https://twitter.com/SovernNation/status&#x2
15.
by sfashset 6y ago
Do you know who "required" Zuckerberg's name to be plastered all over the hospital? Hint: it wasn't Mark Zuckerberg.
16.
by sfashset 6y ago
Sorry you're wrong. Zuckerberg did not want his name on the hopstial. SF General pushed him to put his name front and center (ostensibly so other rich people would be "encouraged" to donate as well).
17.
by sfashset 6y ago
CA didn't do any of those things. They purchased some data an academic had collected from a FB quiz app. There's absolutely nothing stopping one of the NYU academics from selling the data they collect for their study to "Camb
18.
by sfashset 6y ago
Sorry but you’re spreading misinformation in this post. Beyond the fact that your interpretation doesn’t follow from the evidence you’ve provided, as pointed out by the neighbor post, you’ve misstated what CrowdTangle is measuring. All of t
19.
by sfashset 6y ago
Can you let me know where you saw this article mentioned recently? I saw it on my twitter TL today but I'm scratching my head as to who it was that posted it. Thanks!
20.
by sfashset 6y ago
I'd love to hear about a few more of these "watering holes", if you're so inclined.
21.
by sfashset 7y ago
Just out of curiosity - we have people on this thread and on other parts of the internet, claiming they'll watch one "extremist", typically right wing video, and then have their recommendations blitzed with even more extreme&
22.
by sfashset 9y ago
Hmm I don't read the quoted text as a personal attack (snarky, okay fine) and I certainly don't see anything "underhanded" about what I posted, but if you think I'm posting in bad faith (all too endemic online, unfo
23.
by sfashset 9y ago
This is not-even-wrong levels of reasoning here. Personally, your comments on this subthread, and the confidence with which you've delivered them, will stay with me for a long time, and whenever I find myself nodding along with somethi
24.
by sfashset 9y ago
Fact check: False. That figure is comparing the total number of applicants to the match with (first year) residency spots. But the total number of applicants to the match is not the same things as students accepted to (U.S.) medical schools
25.
by sfashset 9y ago
No she didn't. Please stop repeating this claim. She signed up for an email subscription from her personal gmail, on her work computer. That would certainly have been enough to raise her superiors' hackles when discovered, but the
26.
by sfashset 10y ago
Great article, but I'm wondering if it isn't missing the most important piece of information - how did you track down the editors, and their email addresses? Or is this information that can be gleaned from twitter?