sevnin

6 ms·

1.
by sevnin 2y ago
It didn't open a pandoras box, Russians are very creative in the escalation warfare. It was known for quite a bit of time that Russians were mapping these cables out. They are probably, like always, just testing to see the response (ra
2.
by sevnin 2y ago
If he worded it like you did now "Russian line", I would agree--but he didnt. He used a word that Russia loves to use in cry bully situations. It implies that Lithuanians are doing this because they just happen to hate poor russia
3.
by sevnin 2y ago
No I disagree, what are you even refering to? What are these particular actions?, curiously we never refer to russian actions as anti-ukrainian, anti-polish, anti-european. Its always the other way round.
4.
by sevnin 2y ago
Anti-russian? Russia is a major security threat to Lithuania that engages in cyber warfare, disinformation and sabotage campaigns. - Two months ago there were major arson attacks and failed attempts linked to Russians in multiple states lik
5.
by sevnin 2y ago
It supports selective indexing, you can specify paths to exclude from indexing or you might open just a single module, here is more info: https://www.sublimetext.com/docs/indexing.html
6.
by sevnin 2y ago
Don't know on what version of Sublime you are but the newest release has indexing built-in and it works really well.
7.
by sevnin 2y ago
Why are you assuming that all people try to become experts in order to impress, make an impact, earn money? Frequently top performers that commit themselves to these things are only partially motivated by them. Take for example e-sport youn
8.
by sevnin 2y ago
I agree with you but then I don't think you can call this deliberate practice, deliberate practice is not just sitting down and pushing boundaries, it's also having a clear path. In programming (since you said Alan Kay) sitting do
9.
by sevnin 2y ago
Quite a lot of work went into those docs. I won't use it (because I don't have a need for it) but the examples look quite pleasing, nice work!
10.
by sevnin 2y ago
He said "I think" implying that he is not fully sure about the etymology. There is a history section on wikipedia for refactoring if you are interested.
11.
by sevnin 2y ago
Sure, I agree. You could even respond to me fully selfishly - treat me as a stepping stone just to form your argument, nothing wrong with that.
12.
by sevnin 2y ago
My man, thanks for the explanation but I understand the concept I just didn't agree on definition.
13.
by sevnin 2y ago
To be fair OOP of today is much more similar to Simula then to Small Talk, reading the wikipedia I can see almost 1:1 mapping including the modeling philosophy and all that, people mostly yoinked the name from Alan Kay.
14.
by sevnin 2y ago
Huh, I guess that's true, even on wikipedia. I will have to stop using the word then. Though I'm pretty sure most people use it in day-to-day with much more abandon.
15.
by sevnin 2y ago
"By definition" proceeds to define the word in a way that most people won't agree with. Okay mate. Your definition is ass. The person that wrote the article doesn't agree with you, I don't agree with you. I will sti
16.
by sevnin 2y ago
My point is that there is no clear line between a heap of sand and a bunch of sand grains. But at some point the grains become a heap of sand regardless of this. Its easier for us to think about this multitude as a singular object. In the s
17.
by sevnin 2y ago
Yes but the overarching structure they participate in is designed to pursue the goal of making money. If not every single person has the same idea then we cant deduce anything from the group as a whole? When you look at the heap of sand you
18.
by sevnin 2y ago
That's simply not true, goal of most businesses is to make money. You can clearly deduce this goal much more the bigger the company gets. What you say only makes sense if you are confusing the stated publicly goal, the appearance that
19.
by sevnin 2y ago
If by abstraction you mean identifying unifying concepts then I cant understand how you reasoned yourself into thinking that identifying a common method and sharing it between multiple classes by the means of the super class is not abstrac
20.
by sevnin 2y ago
That's a great question. Some might say it's because of the network - that makes microservices messy and so on. But I dont think so, from what I remember plan9 (the os, successor of unix), Rob Pike wanted to make it so that there
21.
by sevnin 2y ago
The problem in software is that very frequently you dont have a real hammer. You have hundred amalgamations of swiss army knives that do everything. Like what is the hammer when you want to add some nice dynamic content to a website? Is it
22.
by sevnin 2y ago
I have to kind of ask, maybe it's the design comitee that instead produces the sphagetti in that case? They are trying to commit themselves into decisions without much knowledge about the problem they are solving. I understand this is
23.
by sevnin 3y ago
That's exactly the point of the lib. It's easy to use for common use cases. If it saved you time at the beginning, saved you from build system nonsense, learning convoluted apis and other crap for a year. That's a big win.
24.
by sevnin 4y ago
Damn, that sounds really cool. The IDE has some amazing features too. The IDE states that you can modify the program while it's running is that actually working well? Cause it seems like a very volatile feature that can go very poorly.
25.
by sevnin 4y ago
Well, I guess at this point the only thing I can say is: I disagree.
26.
by sevnin 4y ago
He is consistent, all functions have that keyword, it's his codebase. He has also has the api(custom) define so his metaprogram knows which functions to publish into the plugin system. C++ syntax is not very regular so if you want to c
27.
by sevnin 4y ago
What do you mean by that?
28.
by sevnin 4y ago
Internal define for static is actually really good, maybe different keyword like 'fn' would be better cause it doesn't clash with windows.h but, redefining static to a different keyword allows you to search for it in a codeba