sentientbicycle

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by sentientbicycle 14y ago

   "So now textbook authors are forced to license their books in such a manner?" No. This would be much bigger news if that were the case. This is who would make them from the council digest: "The bill would require the council to establish
2. 2.▲
   by sentientbicycle 14y ago

   Alcumbierre himself states that it does not violate causality. from: http://www.npl.washington.edu/av/altvw81.html > The possibilities for FTL travel or communication implicit in the Alcubierre drive raise the possibility of causali
3. 3.▲
   by sentientbicycle 14y ago

   OOoohhhh. I totally get it now. You are an unpublished internet stranger and the Alcubierre drive has been scrutinized by some of the top minds in physics. But your criticisms are more important for some reason I don't know. Mkay, going t
4. 4.▲
   by sentientbicycle 14y ago

   I'm sorry, but I just can't find any sort of citation stating that the Alcubierre drive violates any of these principles. I also can't find any mention of paradoxes incurred by the drive and there is only one mention of where the meta-mate
5. 5.▲
   by sentientbicycle 14y ago

   I don't think you are understanding the concept here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubierre_drive#Physics