sensitivekt9q3

4 ms·

1.
by sensitivekt9q3 7d ago
Is it? The first article says they’re on-track to building an automated AI researcher by March 2028. So they haven’t achieved RSI yet, I would think?
2.
by sensitivekt9q3 7d ago
At this point frontier agents could kill half of humanity and people would still be spouting “crazy marketing stunt, they must be really desperate for that IPO.”
3.
by sensitivekt9q3 8d ago
Paid by whom? That makes no sense.
4.
by sensitivekt9q3 8d ago
Nearly all facets of our modern lives depend on the facts that humans are the smartest thing around. Once you have a superintelligent entity that can self-replicate to millions of instances, all bets are off. I can’t see how anyone would no
5.
by sensitivekt9q3 8d ago
I’m not sure I get your point. I’m assuming you’re implying that ASI will solve death. That seems to me like a possibility; just as the possibility that ASI will kill us all faster rather than solving death. I also don’t know what life will
6.
by sensitivekt9q3 8d ago
What kind of childhood dreams, may I ask? This might be my own fault, but I never read/watched/consumed too much sci-fi, and the kinds of sci-fi I did consume were mostly dystopian works or cautionary tales. I just have a hard tim
7.
by sensitivekt9q3 8d ago
That makes sense. You may as well be right. And I agree that the nuclear arms race was probably scarier in practice. I think my main concern is the sheer velocity of this revolution. Between yesterday and today, we’re now seeing the news th
8.
Ask HN: Anyone else feeling uneasy with the latest developments in AI?
17 points by sensitivekt9q3 9d ago|25 comments