senorrib

8 ms·

1.
by senorrib 11d ago
New files are unstaged by default in git. If you’re doing git add -A, that’s on you. There’s nothing wrong with the tool.
2.
by senorrib 11d ago
Why are all the displays placed at 90°? That seems like bad UX.
3.
by senorrib 11d ago
That’s not even close to being true.
4.
by senorrib 16d ago
You know "load bearing" as an expression existed before AI, right?
5.
by senorrib 23d ago
If it’s easy, where’s the evidence? Nothing you wrote is evidence for anything, at most “educated guesses”. > Countries without an extensive bureaucracies are all failed state This is such a ridiculous statement. There’s so many differen
6.
by senorrib 1mo ago
You’re on for a ride. Set at least 50k on the side for that.
7.
by senorrib 1mo ago
0.5% gross on a 1% margin business (which is most retail) is egregious.
8.
by senorrib 1mo ago
Currency is already managed by the elected government, and every democracy in the world traces electronic transactions. Some (like Italy) forbid cash payments in large sums altogether. So what's the boogieman here?
9.
by senorrib 1mo ago
There’s no guaranteed progress, tho. Opus 5 is a regression.
10.
by senorrib 2mo ago
You clearly haven't used Claude to generate code or documentation.
11.
by senorrib 2mo ago
The European motorsports clubs should learn with UEFA and rollback the sale of the FIA to the Saudis.
12.
by senorrib 2mo ago
If my grandma had wheels she would have been a bike. Most of these decisions are made by someone very early on in the process, either a cofounder or an underpaid junior engineer, when the company has zero revenue and no PMF. It's unrea
13.
by senorrib 3mo ago
No it’s not.
14.
by senorrib 3mo ago
It's the municipal IT company, and the dude that did this is a volunteer.
15.
by senorrib 5mo ago
Boss might not even know what Bash is, let alone a crontab.
16.
by senorrib 5mo ago
that's 90%.
17.
by senorrib 5mo ago
Ok, so you prefer to act like an idiot. Good luck.
18.
by senorrib 5mo ago
That’s an economic concept, not a dig at consumers. It’s well known (hell, there’s a nobel laureate for it) that humans are irrational when it comes to economics.
19.
by senorrib 5mo ago
100% and just based on the cypherpunk origins of this whole thing, this the most likely scenario.
20.
by senorrib 5mo ago
Weirdly, I live in a somewhat rural part of Brazil, and all providers are small players. They’re all offering 1Gi FTTH and are now competing on price. Meanwhile, the closest metro area still suffers with cable internet topping at 600M and l
21.
by senorrib 5mo ago
That doesn’t align with my experience. It feels more like a trojan horse. Client and Server rarely (should) share code, and people that are really good at one discipline aren’t that good at the other. Maybe LLMs will change that.
22.
by senorrib 6mo ago
The company in question profits heavily from the open source nature of LibreOffice. They're a big government vendor in Europe, mainly because their codebase is perceived as open source.
23.
by senorrib 6mo ago
Reasons 1-3 could very well be done with ClickHouse policies (RLS) and good data warehouse design. In fact, that’s more secure than a compiler adding a where to a query ran by an all mighty user. Reason 4 is probably an improvement, but cou
24.
by senorrib 6mo ago
Probably both.
25.
by senorrib 7mo ago
That’s just not true at all. Even if 100% of the population keeps 2x guns at home, at 9.5M people that would mean 19M guns. The US has more than 20x that many owned by civilians.
26.
by senorrib 7mo ago
RIP
27.
by senorrib 8mo ago
1) You’re assuming there’s no profit to be made 2) Profit is implicitly embedded in the elasticity curve
28.
by senorrib 8mo ago
That’s exactly how it has been working for me in code. I have a bunch of different components and patterns that the LLMs mix and match. Has been working wonderfully over the past few months.
29.
by senorrib 8mo ago
Supply elasticity. China’s exports did see a reduction in price by exporting to other countries.
30.
by senorrib 8mo ago
No, it isn’t that simple. Who bears the most weight depends on the elasticity of the curve on each side. This is confirming demand is more inelastic, which causes it to bear the burden, but could have been the other way around.

More ›