senand

4 ms·

1.
by senand 1mo ago
I‘m new to this, but mildly skeptical. In complex agentic engineering, there are lots of intermediate steps that depend on each other. Even if you disregard the significant encryption cost, this makes it impractical. So seems like this will
2.
by senand 2mo ago
Can we be a bit more specific regarding the criticism of gitlab?
3.
by senand 2mo ago
> Like why isn't there a 'move this function from this file to this file' tool (copy/paste char range) There Is: https://github.com/oraios/serena
4.
by senand 4mo ago
https://www.openproject.org/blog/open-source-jira-alternativ... I haven‘t used it myself, though
5.
by senand 6mo ago
I suggest to use https://github.com/simonw/rodney instead
6.
by senand 10mo ago
Off-topic, but it’s actually a she
7.
by senand 1y ago
How does this compare to ruff?
8.
by senand 1y ago
I use black and I like it. Where does ruff differ in terms of formatting?
9.
by senand 1y ago
I‘m no expert, but I wonder why Go Routine Style concurrency isn‘t more wide spread
10.
by senand 1y ago
Quote from https://distractionware.com/blog/2020/01/vvvvvv-is-now-open-... , linked in the article: --- snip --- There’s a lot of weird stuff in the C++ version that only really makes sense when you remember t
11.
by senand 2y ago
Which doesn't protect these companies. The CLOUD act allows the US to access the data even if hosted outside of the US, if it's a US company - since 2018. That has been a looming threat ever since, but is now more perilous than ev
12.
by senand 2y ago
That's true. They were numerous attempts to introduce a European alternative, which (more-or-less) failed. The US cloud providers are years ahead. However, the EU is suffering from that; the US companies pay some taxes, but far less th
13.
by senand 2y ago
I like the simplicity. However, it is possible to rollout a feature flag only to a part of the user, e.g. a 1% canary release (cf https://martinfowler.com/bliki/CanaryRelease.html )? If not, I'm not sure this bring
14.
by senand 2y ago
This seems quite reasonable, but I recently heard a podcast ( https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/06/24/280-... ) that LLMs are more likely to be very good at navigating what they have been t
15.
by senand 2y ago
I don't disagree. However, often, when I use a library, I use it within a small function that I control, which I can then type again. Of course, if libraries change e.g. the type they return over time (which they shouldn't also ac
16.
by senand 2y ago
why?
17.
by senand 2y ago
Isn't this better if you use DataSpell from Jetbrains instead of Pycharm?
18.
by senand 3y ago
No, each step could take significantly more time (and resources).
19.
by senand 3y ago
https://www.pokerstrategy.com/
20.
by senand 3y ago
I can't follow. Do you mean the culture of tribes is related to the overestimation of the impact of technology in the short-term, which Gates' Law mentions?
21.
by senand 3y ago
I had to laugh out loud. I want to say that's unrealistic, but alas, it unfortunately is not.
22.
by senand 3y ago
Yes, it's assuming poetry is used, whereby normally the packages needed by the project are defined in pyproject.toml
23.
by senand 4y ago
Interesting! Congrats on the launch. I tried it out, and just first feedback: - I often use the "Home" and "End" key to go the start/end of the line when I'm editing a cell. It scrolls to start/end of the
24.
by senand 4y ago
Indeed, Pfannkuchen in Berlin
25.
by senand 4y ago
What about a price to CO2 (with equivalence calculation) emission? This would automatically make the (beef) meat significantly more expensive. And it would essentially just put a price on something which costs a price later anyway.
26.
by senand 4y ago
I want to say popular isn't _necessarily_ better. Your argument is a counterexample if I had said (which I didn't) that more popular were _always_ worse. In the world of programming (and I guess elsewhere, too), there are simply m
27.
by senand 4y ago
That doesn't mean the imperative languages are "better", though, just more popular. I recommend the following video titled "Why isn't Functional Programming the Norm?": https://www.youtube.com/w
28.
by senand 4y ago
I agree in principle. However, if you work imperatively, you'll use _much_ more (global) state than if you worked with a pragmatic functional language like Clojure. Which in turn leads to normal people not understanding what's goi
29.
by senand 4y ago
Agreed, I see this as a code smell. It's already hard from a semantic point-of-view, normally you have then the same name for two different meanings.
30.
by senand 4y ago
Same here

More ›