selridge

5 ms·

1.
by selridge 7mo ago
Fuckin WebMD just hunkering down in the corner.
2.
by selridge 7mo ago
Sure it is. How many trials did we have before ER doctors started using Wikipedia?
3.
by selridge 7mo ago
You gonna pay for it?
4.
by selridge 7mo ago
You could absolutely randomize care between a doctor and an AI under an IRB. I’d be stunned if there aren’t a dozen studies doing something like this already. You have to justify it, but most places have sections in the document where you r
5.
by selridge 7mo ago
Human use is already widespread. You might as well complain in 2015 about the use of Wikipedia among emergency room doctors. That ship has sailed.
6.
by selridge 7mo ago
The issue is that those hypothetical scenarios do not have to look like how patients actually interact with the tool. Real life use is full of ill posed questions open ended statements inaccurate assessment of symptoms, and conclusory remar
7.
by selridge 7mo ago
I’ve never heard of in my entire life a doctor failing to recognize a medical emergency. /s One of the things that people need to come to grips with is that like Wikipedia people will use ChatGPT because it is there. And the alternativ
8.
by selridge 7mo ago
What do you expect that it’s gonna announce itself in a modal dialogue when you run the software? This isn’t like AI image generation where you’re going to convince yourself that you can tell the difference based on how you think it looks.
9.
by selridge 7mo ago
which textbook would that be?
10.
by selridge 7mo ago
That's not insider trading lol.
11.
by selridge 7mo ago
I think that’s a bad faith read on that paper.
12.
by selridge 7mo ago
What is this nonsense? You said that none of this was in production and then when people pointed out that it was obviously in production, you shifted the goal post to some other measure that you just imagined in your head.
13.
by selridge 7mo ago
LMFAO does it hallucinate to the same degree as GPT 3? Which is what was questioned.
14.
by selridge 7mo ago
Did google not rely on Gemini to do their ISA changeover? https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14928 Was Gemini worse than no tool at all there?
15.
by selridge 7mo ago
No one is smuggling this in. The debate is over. It's transformative. We're in the midst of transformation.
16.
by selridge 7mo ago
Fresh take
17.
by selridge 7mo ago
I sez what I sez
18.
by selridge 7mo ago
Also worth noting that Apple recently paid a king’s ransom for Samsung RAM
19.
by selridge 7mo ago
The problem is, we have no real understanding of what people will or will not do with this technology. Will humans only be interested in “real“ activity? We have no idea, and most people are just guessing in a way that flatters some underst
20.
by selridge 7mo ago
God, thank you. Finally, someone pointing out all of this is just people announcing what has been in play for half a century.
21.
by selridge 7mo ago
Yeah, those people love authenticity. They pay a lot for authentic Modiglianis.
22.
by selridge 7mo ago
Why should anyone care about either of those two people?
23.
by selridge 7mo ago
Will smith eating spaghetti is art, sorry.
24.
by selridge 7mo ago
I don’t know that this has to be the way. One thing that is really going to confound this very common idea that taste and quality and personal characteristics will win the day, is that you can use AI to represent all of these to other peopl
25.
by selridge 7mo ago
If we’re restricting ourselves to the United States, then we have to admit that we have been incinerating public education for decades. American schools have had to do more with less and eventually less with less, for as long as most of us
26.
by selridge 7mo ago
Copilot suggests leftpad
27.
by selridge 7mo ago
I think we need to invent that distinction, which is notable since the article has MANY opportunities to say it clearly. Instead we are given a picture where the improvement of the agent and the software (here docs are included) is a LOOP,
28.
by selridge 7mo ago
Why would it matter whether or not the robot looks something up if it makes a novel discovery? Why would it matter that the discovery wasn't just novel but felt like an unconventional one to me, someone who is probably a total outsider
29.
by selridge 7mo ago
>"If A and B are separately in the training data, the model can provide a result when A and B occur in the input because the model has made a connection between A and B in the latent space." This statement (The one I was replyi
30.
by selridge 7mo ago
>I would honestly be surprised if it couldn't do it. You'd be surprised if an LLM couldn't write *any* program?

More ›