selfmodruntime

9 ms·

181.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
VPNs are increasingly useless, with Cloudflare in front of 80% of the public net. I always wonder if people giving this advice try it themselves, most major sites are unusable with a common VPN provider.
182.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
I've seen your work for years now and I always wondered how you are so productive.
183.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
You have watched more anime than I have read books, not by far, but I find it impressive nonetheless. This is a long shot, but any recommendation to someone who really like Heavenly Delusion?
184.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
Any source for this? Every source I can find speaks for three to eight degrees colder in longer winters. That's still very much survivable, most of Germany rarely gets in the negative double digits as of now.
185.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
I had to upgrade my iPhone to iOS 26 to setup my watch. I wish I had never done it. Nothing is where it's supposed to be from a UI perspective. Stuff breaks often. I can't use my contact search bar to search contacts. It only sear
186.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
Yes! That is it!
187.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
Are you expecting me to comb through thousands of cases? Obviously they were arrested for saying legal things, if their arrest doesn't follow a conviction in 90% of cases.
188.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
> I am hurt when I think I am hearing words from a fellow citizen that are their own opinion, when instead it is a foreign actor pushing a narrative for their state. No you are not. > I am all for free speech, but I am not for anonymo
189.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
Ha! What sanctions? We are not sanctioning like we truly mean it. > So I understand your point but you're essentially arguing that because democracies can abuse power, No, my point is that because democracies are abusing power, r
190.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
No. My point is that real people are hurt by fraud and espionage and comparing outlawing those to outlawing speech is inane
191.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
Well you see, <my side>'s swarm intelligence is organic and honest and people from <other side> are bots. Jokes aside, the Harris campaign openly manipulated Reddit to get their opinions on the top [1]. I was there on elect
192.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
2 is wrong. The CUII even blocks political activists because they dare to post their entire blocklist [1] [1]: https://lina.sh/blog/telefonica-sabotages-me
193.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
> JD Vance and Musk are precisely the wrong entities to have opinions on stuff like this because they are on the wrong side of that line most of the time. Especially Musk, but Vance has his own ulterior motives to berate the EU on anythi
194.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
ISPs act as gatekeepers for essential information. When they control what flows, they’re effectively regulating speech.
195.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
> The issue I have with your argument is that you're treating inaction as neutral. The issue I have with your argument is that you're treating action as a necessary evil enacted by a well meaning government. It isn't. >
196.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
> In his free time Ivan comes to HN and poses as a free speech absolutist. I am not an absolutist, far from it, and I'm pretty sad that you feel the need to resort to personal attacks, even if indirect.
197.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
Are you really countering an argument against censorship by a power abusing entity with another group famous for power abuse?
198.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
Why should a private entity control what people see online?
199.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
> He actually praised Vance role as a defender of democratic values, but Vance is known to deny Greenlands souvereignity, ready to capitulate to a russian dictator, indifference to police killing a protester recently, etc. Horrible stuff
200.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
> And you are falling into the trap of thinking that if a person is busy deconstructing what used to be one of the larger democracies in the world that their other words are going to be taken at face value, which obviously is not going t
201.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
> So you are basically arguing that it's hard to distinguish, therefore we shouldn't try No, I said because it's hard to distinguish, therefore we can not use it as an excuse to enact censorship. > By that logic, we cou
202.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
"UK police made over 12,000 arrests under laws criminalizing communications causing 'annoyance or anxiety,' with arrests rising 58% since 2019" [1]. Only 10% lead to a conviction. What then, is it, other than a governmen
203.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
The CUII does not need a verdict to enact censorship. Make of that what you will.
204.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
188 Criminal Code Insult, defamation and slander directed against persons in political life[1]: (1) If an insult (§ 185) is committed against a person involved in the political life of the people, either publicly, at a meeting or by dissemi
205.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
No I can't, since I lack the monetary funds. My claim stands correct, going to the federal constitutional court is expensive enough that many people are barred from that option. My claim stands correct - no judicial verdict is needed f
206.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
You are focusing on identity and intent, e.g you are defending the restriction of speech based on who is speaking and why . Knowing the difference between an opinion of an origin you consider valid and one you consider invalid is difficu
207.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
> I believe he knows he's technically in the wrong for not abiding to the law, Free speech loses when people answer to critics of a speech limiting law that they should just follow it.
208.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
And yet this is the only thing people seem to focus on in a discussion about a government agency without any of those attributes.
209.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
> obviously an idiot praising Vance's and Elon's actions He praised their opinions on free speech. You should be able to differentiate a single opinion objectively from the people holding them.
210.
by selfmodruntime 8mo ago
> There's a DNS blocklist from media industry applied by German ISPs By the CUII with no judicial oversight. German organizations like the CCC and free speech activists very much hate that this is a thing.

More ›