seldonnn

6 ms·

1.
by seldonnn 3y ago
A 5% buyback does not explain a 100% increase in share price.
2.
by seldonnn 6y ago
You overestimate the amount of mental energy people are willing to spend to figure out what the “right” streaming service will be for that month.
3.
by seldonnn 6y ago
The news here is probably more about the decline in aircraft ticket prices than some surprising change in India iPhone costs.
4.
by seldonnn 6y ago
it help fill the customer acquisition funnel, which drives revenue for other products. The product is effectively marketing expense.
5.
by seldonnn 6y ago
Yeah Intel has quite a few I hear
6.
by seldonnn 7y ago
It’s a tech company guys
7.
by seldonnn 7y ago
Apparently the previous versions just weren’t that scary
8.
by seldonnn 7y ago
They will then import the coal power from Poland :)
9.
by seldonnn 7y ago
Every investment is an alternative to another investment...
10.
by seldonnn 7y ago
That’s 3% of market cap, try again on your explanation. Hint: accelerating revenue growth
11.
by seldonnn 7y ago
Less than a months production. For context, Boeing has over 7 years of MAX production in backlog.
12.
by seldonnn 7y ago
I’m not an engineer and read it as the latter, correct meaning. Preposition “on” makes it pretty clear.
13.
by seldonnn 7y ago
You have it backwards.
14.
by seldonnn 7y ago
Oh so you don’t bother to figure out the facts prior to posting your opinion online? So smart!
15.
by seldonnn 7y ago
There is very little product overlap so this is categorically false. UTC makes aircraft engines, commercial jet interiors, and avionics. Raytheon makes missiles, radars, and ISR equipment. Please explain how you make a missile in a a turbin
16.
by seldonnn 7y ago
You don’t pay tax if you don’t make money.
17.
by seldonnn 7y ago
You can load one of those puppies up with 22 air to air missiles, have a forward F-35 pass along target information, and light them up from the F-15. One team. F-15 is a missile truck that can go Mach 2.2. Ask because it goes Mach 2.2 it i
18.
by seldonnn 8y ago
This isn’t about a proposed deal not closing. This is about a proposed deal being reported as such, when in fact there had not ever been deal talks in the first place.
19.
by seldonnn 8y ago
This is the pac-2 missile which was fielded in 1990 and not designed to combat these kinds of missiles. PAC-3 is much more advanced and the kill vehicle much more accurate.