sebak

6 ms·

1.
by sebak 10y ago
The article seems to be about Java vs Python. But it really only talks about static vs dynamic typing. Not only has everything about that subject already been said 1000 times. It's also not Java-specific. Java sucks IMO not because of
2.
by sebak 10y ago
Unfortunately, the situation hasn't improved much. Besides, even if you get it set up, the quality of the recognition isn't even close to the one from Google.
3.
by sebak 10y ago
The main reason there is a fetish for these micropackages is a fetish for github stars. The formula seems to be: Overly generic + Simple + Javascript = Lots of stars. That being said, there is something to be said for using these micropacka
4.
by sebak 10y ago
Javascript is in fact special because it's one of the few languages where the developer can't choose the version of the language to use. It's dictated by users with 4 year old browsers.
5.
by sebak 11y ago
Only: there's no real-time db support like what Meteor with livequery does. The term 'real-time' is abused a lot here. Not only does neither Meteor, nor feathers offer real-time in the real meaning of the word. A better word
6.
by sebak 11y ago
Actually, for most use cases, newest update wins is sufficient if it can be done on a fine granular basis (one property of an object/document). It's what web applications have been doing for forever and being a 'realtime&#x27
7.
by sebak 11y ago
How does it compare to Meteor? And about the claim: 'exceptionally fast'. What does this mean? Compared to what? Any benchmarks?
8.
by sebak 11y ago
Related: the meteor people announced they'll be working on this problem. http://info.meteor.com/blog/reactive-graphql
9.
by sebak 11y ago
1) Do we know if it will be more widespread? Although the stronger stuff is also illegal in the Netherlands, it's very easy to find and I don't think the Netherlands have more drug addicts then another country (no source for this,
10.
by sebak 11y ago
Here in Europe, I asked around to some firms like Aston Carter and Computerfutures recently. They had 0 requests from customers for React and A LOT for angular. Now these work mainly for enterprise companies which are hard to convince of a
11.
by sebak 11y ago
Well, the angular 2 beta release blog mentions that these the docs for es5/es6 are still in the works...
12.
by sebak 11y ago
Basically they're saying: "To succeed you need to have an awesome idea that hasn't been done before. You need a great team and build a great product your users will love". Wow, thanks for the advice, why didn't I th
13.
by sebak 11y ago
The problem is not with having public urls. The problem is with public urls that don't have enough random numbers or if these numbers aren't generated by a CSPRNG.
14.
by sebak 11y ago
They didn't really have a business model to begin with, they were one of those "let's create a hype and see what happens" startups, led by a guy who thinks of himself as another Steve Jobs. The problem is that their fram
15.
This is what famo.us has become after again months of silence, what a joke(famous.co)
4 points by sebak 11y ago|0 comments