search_facility

5 ms·

1.
by search_facility 12d ago
Well said!
2.
by search_facility 1mo ago
Great, this is unique trait and helpful one - Firefox is here to stay
3.
by search_facility 2mo ago
This "hidden knowledge" is fun to read but pain to remember and use, especially when working with multi-platform environments // Switched from bash to plain python scripts for shell stuff everywhere several years ago, an
4.
by search_facility 3mo ago
... Today its "Claude just needs to write it" and the "hard part" is the prompt :)
5.
by search_facility 3mo ago
Current situation exist presisely due researches of 20th century though. This is largely connected things
6.
by search_facility 3mo ago
There are still problems though - in Chrome translation addon simply no way to login properly so its broken //
7.
by search_facility 3mo ago
Also represents good test coverage
8.
by search_facility 4mo ago
It's the opposite, engineers do know. Claiming otherwise is way too generous and over confident. I mean between this two "knowings" the Claude inner workings are much more clear for engineers, including many side effects, alt
9.
by search_facility 4mo ago
Well, at the very least we have a base to distinct different kinds then. Probably the main problem of people implying LLM consciousness is that they imply LLM have human-kind of consciousness. Judging only on "how they speak", g
10.
by search_facility 4mo ago
It is useful, so yes
11.
by search_facility 4mo ago
MOE basically work that way already, QWEN/etc with low active params (A-number in name) allows to inference big models locally (only active params have to fit into memory)
12.
by search_facility 5mo ago
With both cases the agent doing something is human . And human beings are indeed conscious. Outside human needs LLM are useless. Math, as a tool, is just a proxy for people using LLMs, as well as GPUs spending cycles on calculating the mat
13.
by search_facility 5mo ago
> weak reasoning once you get off the beaten path Yep. And LLM engeneers improving this issues see perfect correlation with only one thing - data quality and quantity through training pipeline. LLM internals are secondary on many metrics
14.
by search_facility 5mo ago
Math used in LLMs is perfectly reducible and Gödel have nothing to do with it - inside commonly used axioms (which sufficient for LLM to exist and outside of Kurt Gödel scope) there are ZERO questions/uncertainties how it works, it&#x2
15.
by search_facility 5mo ago
+100, companies certainly have direct interest in pumping asset evaluation, and emotional attachment is financial valuable thing. Emotional attachment sells better than xxx this days
16.
by search_facility 5mo ago
Imho no, math itself have no conciousness. Quite confidently its a helpful tool that does not act by himself.
17.
by search_facility 5mo ago
I can not simulate my brain, it's a huge stretch to imply this. But with LLMs - anyone can simulate LLM. LLM can be simulated without any uncertainties in pen and paper and a lot of time. Does it mean that 100 tons of paper plus 100 ye
18.
by search_facility 5mo ago
Since the times GPT-2 was reimplemented inside Minecraft - its quite obvious LLMs are just math. Nothing else, by nature. Modern LLMs have the same math as in GPT-2 - just bigger and with extra stuff around - and math is the only area of hu
19.
by search_facility 5mo ago
With current standartization the issue of "page not working on non-Chrome browser" is non-existent. Thanks god nowadays everything (pages) work everywhere in very similar manner, I am using chrome, firefox, safary and opera and ha
20.
by search_facility 5mo ago
But on the other hand, adding LLM with strong guards (not yet here but doable for popular attack vectors) into the human loop can drastically eliminate insider factor, imho.
21.
by search_facility 5mo ago
probably 8M params are too much even :)
22.
by search_facility 6mo ago
Well, this is a business model, not a coincidence... They are in the battle of selling fresh hardware each and every year consistenly
23.
by search_facility 6mo ago
Exactly!
24.
by search_facility 6mo ago
Interesting! Can it be used in Google Colab to open temporary access to python server? NGROK can be attached this way in 6 lines of code
25.
by search_facility 6mo ago
biology plays the role, certainly, but nature was trying to capture a model for 3D physical interactions first of all, physics first. And final choice of two 2D sensors is explicitly optimal and minimally effective for 3D - so it can not be
26.
by search_facility 6mo ago
Our 3D visualization relies havily on photons doing the heavy lifting of traversing 3D space in straight lines, people get, you know, accustomed to it. In fact how we see things is frozen by physics, not brains - they are just accommodated
27.
by search_facility 11mo ago
Interesting research, but it is still fascinates me why AI devs of current SOTAs ignore possibility to add numbers as first-grade citizens to AI. like for example suggested here: https://huggingface.co/papers/2502.09741
28.
by search_facility 1y ago
Seems the team and working conditions worth mentioning it twice, nonetheless. Good there are places to work with normal knowledge culture, without artificial overfitting to “corporate happiness” :)
29.
by search_facility 1y ago
They definitely does not aware of soviet reality that “roof over head” usually is not in the place where human want to live, same with job. if student after university decided (not by student, by state distributing workforce) to go work at
30.
by search_facility 1y ago
turns out - no, by intuition they should do this for sure - but no. UPD: Found the paper: - https://huggingface.co/papers/2502.09741 - https://fouriernumber.github.io/ in paper mentioned “number” is a

More ›