sdthjbvuiiijbb

117 ms·

1.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 5d ago
Calling it "witch hunting" is just dishonest. That term implies a baseless overreaction to a heavily exaggerated or imagined threat. That's hardly what's going on here. Unlike witches, AI slop really is everywhere and it
2.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 16d ago
Almost every private tracker has a bonus point system: you are awarded bonus points for seeding (usually non-linearly, where the longer you seed the more points you earn for that torrent per hour) and can exchange them for upload credit. Th
3.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 24d ago
Using or not using a coding agent is not what I took issue with. What I find devoid of responsibility is the argument you made originally--that making choices as a consumer informed by anything external to the direct value you're payin
4.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 25d ago
On the contrary, I'm trying to understand as best I can. I find your position so completely devoid of any inkling of personal or social responsibility that it takes quite some empathy to muster up a reply that's not wildly uncivil
5.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 25d ago
Bizarre reply. It's not "dominating everything you do". It's one specific thing. Grok exists in a very crowded space and it's incredibly easy to not use it. If this is your reaction to someone taking a very easy sta
6.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 1mo ago
And any arbitrage is also trivially exploited by the electricity company, who has a much greater financial incentive and scale, so there's really no reason to think that it's going to widen in the future either.
7.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 1mo ago
The human geography of Germany is completely different from the US. The US has much more continuous sprawl vs Germany has more clearly defined borders between higher density areas (towns and cities) and lower density ones along with land us
8.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 2mo ago
>English isn't my first language and even I know "palette" is wrong. The "and" in your comment implies that you think that being a native speaker should make someone more accurate with this. In fact it's the
9.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 2mo ago
The Pacific salmon fisheries in North America are generally well managed. Overfishing isn't really a huge threat as a result. In fact you could argue that commercial wild salmon fishing is ecologically beneficial insofar as it brings
10.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 2mo ago
France has more than 6 million people. I think you meant 0.5%
11.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 2mo ago
Yes it's rational market behavior. But it bothers people for such a blatantly worthless middleman to capture all consumer surplus for themselves while providing zero value.
12.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 3mo ago
>belongs to a party that is pretty much advertising on wanting to be a smaller government that gets involved less. That is a large part of why people vote for them. I don't think that's been the Republican messaging for years (
13.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 4mo ago
Ok, bad faith it is then. Nobody reasonable in good faith could conclude that I "hate Jews" based on my reply. Just because I called Zionism settler colonialism? That's a view so prominent that it (apparently) has its own wik
14.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 4mo ago
I don't even know what that question means. Israel does exist. There's no "should" to discuss. Are you asking if I think Israelis should be kicked out of Israel? No. I mean, the real question is surely whether you think
15.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 4mo ago
>The point of terrorism is to be visible, dramatic and cause teror. It's not to get a stealth award for hacking the coupon system at the shop and get away with it I agree with you... that's exactly what makes this situation so
16.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 4mo ago
>Someone writing “F Zionists” very likely does not make a distinction between Zionists and Jews. That's completely untrue and this is either bad faith or you need to go outside more. Here, I'll say it myself: Fuck Zionism. I ha
17.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 4mo ago
>Not like a certain terrorist organization[1] with Palestine Liberation in its name[1] literally pioneered armed airplane hijackings for its cause, successfully[2] performing[3] quite[4] a few[5] of[6] them[7] back in the day. And? What&
18.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 4mo ago
You've missed the point of the comment that you've replied to. There's a well known adverse selection effect because the people who would pay for no ads are exactly the people who you most want to be able to serve ads to: peo
19.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 4mo ago
The ones that annoy me the most, which are very widespread, are the clickbaity one-weird-trick style ones: "what really Xes" "is genuinely X" "that actually Xes" "is/makes/does/etc a real X&
20.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 4mo ago
>And I assume the top 10-15% in Paris is substantially more than 80k? I don't think that's a good assumption. 80k is rather high for Paris. That's a Google salary at their small office there (or it was when I checked a few
21.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 4mo ago
Not even the first time I've seen random AI garbage from this domain on HN. I share your sense of despair.
22.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 5mo ago
If this truly set off zero flags for you then you're probably just not very attuned to LLM writing style. I've noticed that most people are not. I posted a bunch of specifics in a reply to the GP since I was quite annoyed with bei
23.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 5mo ago
The line "This is the part that really matters." and the line "This is the circular citation pattern, and it’s one of the most under discussed attacks on the “retrieval augmented generation” trust model. " both raised fl
24.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 5mo ago
It's also clearly AI generated writing. That doesn't help its credibility or interest. I'm extremely suspicious of people who use AI to write an ostensibly personal blog, for all the usual obvious reasons.
25.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 5mo ago
No, "typically" it's a "know-it-when-you-see-it" kind of thing. Trying to delineate precise word count boundaries is a misrepresentation of how these words are used. The numbers you gave are reasonable guidelines bu
26.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 5mo ago
>it's becoming more and more likely that developments in AI lead to a K graph in experience / value - senior / self sufficient workers will be significantly more valuable than ever. I don't buy this at all, this narra
27.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 5mo ago
Nonsense. It's a common construction that LLMs didn't exactly invent. I don't think their usage evokes LLM writing at all (not short and punchy enough).
28.
by sdthjbvuiiijbb 5mo ago
Yeah. I think 1. N4 leads to a white win. It's fairly easy to verify that a black rook move will lead to a white win (1...R5 2. R2 and 1...Rx4 2. Rx4 N5 3. Rx5#). So the critical line is 1. N4 N5, but then 2. Nx6+ K7 3. R4 also leads t