scrub_tier

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by scrub_tier 8y ago

   Perhaps the poster isn't particularly articulate. There are hawks on both sides of the isle, but I'm not necessarily convinced that they're comparably equal. I personally would be interested who's backers benefit most
2. 2.▲
   by scrub_tier 8y ago

   Hi! I agree completely that we should not language shiv out legal problems away lest we destroy ourselves in favorable ambiguity. My question was clearly poorly articulated (smells of irony). The first clause established a clear goal and in
3. 3.▲
   by scrub_tier 8y ago

   Interesting, I appreciate your feedback. Why does equality if availability with local state institutions appeal to you?
4. 4.▲
   by scrub_tier 8y ago

   Hehe, fair enough. May I ask the question this way? What is the intrinsic risk of a land war between the US and another foreign power? I'm currently mobile trying to find the ATF and NRA data on distribution, but my recollection was t
5. 5.▲
   by scrub_tier 8y ago

   Hi Justin. It's not that I disagree. In fact, I too believe it to be intrinsically hypocritical than not the more I've re-read it since I posed my initial question. HOWEVER, how we talk about things can be colored by our choice o
6. 6.▲
   by scrub_tier 8y ago

   I'm realizing I'm only partially familiar with some of our laws. Is there any data you or the poster can link to illustrate your claims?
7. 7.▲
   by scrub_tier 8y ago

   Hi! Appreciate the feedback. So you raise any interesting point. I'm only concerned about the law of the land since it's generally more or less the common ground we are forced to live on. New question, and this is more open to de
8. 8.▲
   by scrub_tier 8y ago

   Respectfully, even if there was a strong recognized militia they had a tank I cannot follow the reasoning. We're a troubled democracy, but the army is practically saintly to many. A sample size of 1 is small, but does anyone here NO
9. 9.▲
   by scrub_tier 8y ago

   While I happen to agree and appreciate your input, let's avoid words like hypocracy for now. It tends to nurture hostility and I'm trying to get some real insight.
10. 10.▲
    by scrub_tier 8y ago

    Undoubtedly supressors do decrease gas discharge from the muzzle and increase the safety of the system to the user. However, I feel you've chosen a best case scenario and haven't addressed my other points. Subsonic ammunition is
11. 11.▲
    by scrub_tier 8y ago

    "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Respectfully, how does your desire to bear private arms contribute to your militia