screwlewse

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by screwlewse 13y ago

   My favorite feature so far is to add a suffix to the existing selector. &-suffix {} or &_suffix {} so nice.
2. 2.▲
   by screwlewse 15y ago

   You make it sound as if Developers are solely to blame for this "mess", and they did it for superflous reasons. I call BS on that. Case and point: Border radius and linear gradients made things better for EVERYONE. Developers didn't have
3. 3.▲
   by screwlewse 16y ago

   RE: low hanging fruit. It's assumed that you have already done that. Just one more piece of the puzzle. As the test suggests.. it would be good to code in a way that's less bloated, however it's not always going to make a huge difference.
4. 4.▲
   by screwlewse 16y ago

   Yes, I do. I come from large corporations, where studies have shown that when a site is slower, even by 50-100 milliseconds, your traffic WILL decrease. When your site gets a million views a day, 2 percent is large. Thats when you star
5. 5.▲
   by screwlewse 16y ago

   I removed the external font file and some other css that may skew the results. Next, I'll re-test and the charts automatically update.
6. 6.▲
   by screwlewse 16y ago

   Yikes! You are right.. what was I thinking adding the @font-face. However, the rest of the css is used in all the tests as a base. I don't see how that would affect the test considering it's on all scenarios (except the no css scenario)
7. 7.▲
   Different CSS techniques and their performance(screwlewse.com)

   45 points by screwlewse 16y ago|8 comments