scoon1329

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by scoon1329 6y ago

   > Yes, appeals to authority aren't much use in the present climate. So, that's why he needs to offer convincing evidence. It sounds like he offers none (I haven't read it, just relying on the summary above). My point was m
2. 2.▲
   by scoon1329 6y ago

   > In other words, current investigations do not support evidence of harm. You missed the exception he mentions. "IARC is the outlier in this respect, having determined in 2011 that EMFs are ‘possibly carcinogenic to humans’." (
3. 3.▲
   by scoon1329 6y ago

   > ...I think it's pretty fair to label them based off of that one comment. For content that abhorrent, any number of occurrences above zero is enough to tell what kind of person a user is. Whilst I agree that the comment you refer t
4. 4.▲
   by scoon1329 8y ago

   It may not affect the validity of the argument, but it may suggest something about the motivations of the person making the argument. Each person's idea of where something sits on the spectrum of right and wrong differs. If someone is
5. 5.▲
   by scoon1329 9y ago

   The issue is more complex than just a bigger pipe. As a site owner, you pay a service provider (or cloud hosting service or whatever) to offer you a certain amount of bandwidth to host your site. The problem comes when other ISP's impl