scmccarthy

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by scmccarthy 10mo ago

   It's clearest in the conclusion.
2. 2.▲
   by scmccarthy 13y ago

   dotcoma's comment however, claimed "no NSA etc". While it's not pertinent to this article, I think pointing out spurious claims (which people might be believing and acting on) has value regardless.
3. 3.▲
   by scmccarthy 13y ago

   It wasn't sufficient data. OP was describing their foolish attitude at the time.