schnischna

5 ms·

1.
by schnischna 6y ago
All those things are partially socialism. Simply instating minimum wage laws doesn't make a country fully socialist, but it is a puzzle piece. It means the wage is not set by the market anymore, but by a committee.
2.
by schnischna 6y ago
I know that the rules exist, so I can assign a highly likelihood for there to be a reason for the rules to exist. Also I have read the one or other thing.
3.
by schnischna 6y ago
It's a nice thought. But where would all the unreliable people work then? Or you think they would just become reliable if they would get paid more? That seems unlikely to me. There are unreliable rich people, too. People with gambling
4.
by schnischna 6y ago
Because he was fired for refusing to comply to the orders of his employer. Whether they seemed reasonable or not. And he seems to have switched from worrying about his safety to campaigning against Amazon. Why should anybody be forced to em
5.
by schnischna 6y ago
That's why people work hard to acquire skills, to be able to work in better jobs. I have never run a warehouse, but I suspect that many of the strange seeming rules are in place because people otherwise try to exploit the system (like
6.
by schnischna 6y ago
What is so bad about treating somebody as someone who can pick and pack your parcels? It's just a job? And what does it have to do with Capitalism. You think under Socialism they would care about your individuality? No they wouldn&#x27
7.
by schnischna 6y ago
"This data, known as “CVVs” in the cybercrime underground, is sold in packages for about $15 to $20 per record" Would it be terribly complicated to make single use credit cards? Like if you have an app from your bank (which they p
8.
by schnischna 6y ago
For email I just use the email plan that comes with my very cheap blog hosting plan.
9.
by schnischna 6y ago
Shouldn't they simply curb the (alleged) tax evasions then?
10.
by schnischna 6y ago
Sure - but even then, how can such a policy be justified. They can not claim it is for the benefit of the people.
11.
by schnischna 6y ago
"In my case, I am willing to pay more to the local shop if everybody is doing it. If Im the only one, the benefit is lost but I personally pay the cost." But a significant number of people should be wanting to do it - after all, t
12.
by schnischna 6y ago
I don't understand that kind of thing: the government is presumably elected by the people. Why would the people want the government to fight a business that they could voluntarily avoid, without any government intervention whatsoever?
13.
by schnischna 6y ago
I wonder if it could be possible to mix test samples to test several people at once? Like maybe take 10 or even 100 samples, mix them together, and the test shows positive if any of the 100 has the disease? In that case, the samples could b