sceptic123

9 ms·

1.
by sceptic123 5d ago
And like AI, I imagine you're confidently wrong here.
2.
by sceptic123 5d ago
Why 10x? If you’re making up numbers why not 100x or 1000x?
3.
by sceptic123 6d ago
My feeling is that models like Astra and Fable are not made for engineers
4.
by sceptic123 6d ago
Then they fix the new thing implementation[1] and realise the original gains that were promised [1]( https://www.conviva.ai/resource/making-io_uring-actually-fas... )
5.
by sceptic123 6d ago
It's almost like there's someone, who perhaps even got elected on the back of getting the files released and who exerts power over media outlets, that doesn't want this to be a big story.
6.
by sceptic123 7d ago
Business model always struck me as a little odd when Tailwind, by it's very nature, makes it trivial to copy existing implementations
7.
by sceptic123 7d ago
So not "How well do agents use test/verification techniques?" like the title says then. It just looks like a lot of effort to go to in a way that doesn't answer the question the title poses. I'd love to see somethin
8.
by sceptic123 8d ago
So basically "one-shot <complicated thing> using <x> testing methodology". I don't think that's a very effective test of an agents ability.
9.
by sceptic123 8d ago
But what's the initial setup? Was it greenfields every time? And _how_ were the different testing frameworks used? What's the AGENTS.md there? So many things can influence these tests in positive/negative ways that are not in
10.
by sceptic123 9d ago
we call our local co-op "the coop" for no real reason :)
11.
by sceptic123 14d ago
the author of the article does the same
12.
by sceptic123 15d ago
Also doesn't seem to remember player position between app openings
13.
by sceptic123 15d ago
That isn't going to be very helpful is it? > can you build a website to promote the app > can you add a page showing off the winamp mode
14.
by sceptic123 15d ago
Looks good, but ran into loading spinners fairly quickly, large playlists kill this, I suspect because the api is not properly respecting the cache headers and is refetching the same information repeatedly and thus getting rate limited. Als
15.
by sceptic123 15d ago
Teams was never great to start with
16.
by sceptic123 19d ago
We've been using Keycloak for a while, it's definitely not bad, but there are times when it's been frustrating, and getting it both stable and scalable seem to be incompatible goals. It's super powerful and can do whatev
17.
by sceptic123 21d ago
It's a learning curve, but it can work, you just need to be comfortable with large (and likely quite negative) reviews for the inevitable large MRs that will get generated. The important things to get right are the same as they were be
18.
by sceptic123 22d ago
Maybe they will have to use/repair/upgrade the ones they already own?
19.
by sceptic123 22d ago
Is the "Water Project" intended as a sly dig or some kind of nod to AI water use concerns?
20.
by sceptic123 27d ago
Don't make the "Don't paste the AI website, please" site. You can rather use some kind of search tool to find one of the many that already exist. If it's not quite saying what you want, maybe just reach out to the a
21.
by sceptic123 1mo ago
How does this mean you don't need an api?
22.
by sceptic123 1mo ago
My "favourite" site was < https://6a6fa3376288679d094a8437--ar-testing-coffee-2b15c6a0... > with footer image captions that are amazing. Precision Late Art being the best one.
23.
by sceptic123 1mo ago
Who could have guessed this would end up with many polarised "massive problem" / "not a problem" comments
24.
by sceptic123 1mo ago
Isn't there value to the verbose information too? Knowing what a tool does and what the inputs are increase the likelyhood of successful tool calls.
25.
by sceptic123 1mo ago
I liked Boop's[1] strapline for this: > Stop pasting company secrets into random websites. [1]< https://boop.okat.best/ >
26.
by sceptic123 1mo ago
nostalgia's not what it used to be
27.
by sceptic123 2mo ago
May I suggest opening issues on the repo if you're keen for feedback?
28.
by sceptic123 2mo ago
> If you're sharing your own work and there's a way to try it out, put "Show HN" in the title. Make sure you've read the Show HN guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/showhn.html. :shrug:
29.
by sceptic123 2mo ago
I'm questioning what the purpose is of pushing it at this point in the project lifecycle. It may not have a fancy website but it is making flashy marketing claims in that readme. How about being upfront about the maturity of the projec
30.
by sceptic123 2mo ago
I'm curious on the goal of releasing software like this, it's making some crazy claims right out of the gate, but is obviously not production ready or battle hardened. There's some reasonably obvious security issues and not a

More ›