sbrocket

5 ms·

1.
by sbrocket 4mo ago
Let's not speak in absolutes like that you (absolutely) "could not" do this. Most matters depend on the specific context of the situation. The example you mention about a browser and JavaScript on web pages is a very differen
2.
by sbrocket 4mo ago
It is kooky that you think some conspiracy nonsense about Bambu being a Chinese company and so something from Josef Prusa, is better than a detailed (if AI-written) analysis of all the ways that Bambu's networking plugin is a tightly
3.
by sbrocket 4mo ago
I understand that filter, I think, but unfortunately your filter is failing you here. The original post was replaced by Hacker News, and was originally a long post on Github - https://github.com/jarczakpawel/OrcaSlicer-
4.
by sbrocket 4mo ago
The original post that this commenter objected to, which has now been replaced by Hacker News with a tweet from Josef Prusa with none of the same technical detail, is from one of the primary players in this whole debacle. Here's the or
5.
by sbrocket 4mo ago
This sounds like pro-Bambu wishful thinking rather than an informed opinion. On what basis do you believe proprietary plugins or libraries are allowed under any conditions by the AGPLv3? And if you want to counter that you didn't say &
6.
by sbrocket 4mo ago
This is nonsense. AGPLv3 is GPLv3 with an added term that extends it to SaaS/network hosted software as well as software distributed in binary or source form. What are you suggesting the AGPL allows that GPL does not? AI-generated text
7.
by sbrocket 11mo ago
It seems like you’re making the same faulty assumption that a lot of libertarians do, which is assuming that just because that is possible and perhaps even economically incentivized, it will happen automatically and immediately to meet dema