sbjs

7 ms·

1.
by sbjs 1y ago
It's a highly optimized and extremely simple yet robust implementation of it, sure. Is that reason to dismiss it? Consider Vite's node-side HMR implementation. It creates its own module system on top of Node's native modu
2.
by sbjs 1y ago
That's orthogonal, and in fact you probably would use TypeScript to translate JSX to JS when using this library. What this does is (a) provide a Node.js module hook to call your transpile function when it encounters TSX/JSX file
3.
by sbjs 1y ago
It's English, it just looks like regex. In English, the ? belongs inside the parens in this case.
4.
by sbjs 1y ago
Just updated the text to be hopefully much clearer.
5.
by sbjs 1y ago
Oh no, I must have mis-explained it. The file `site/myfile.js` does exist. All FileTree does is recursively load all files in a dir into memory. The `useTree` module hook does two things: * Pulls the file from memory when loading it
6.
by sbjs 1y ago
Just added some code samples, thanks for the suggestion.
7.
Show HN: Mid-level Node.js helpers for building a front-end website(immaculata.dev)
1 points by sbjs 1y ago|0 comments
8.
Comparing Immaculata to Vite(immaculata.dev)
1 points by sbjs 1y ago|0 comments
9.
(ab?)using Node module hooks to speed up development(immaculata.dev)
38 points by sbjs 1y ago|16 comments
10.
by sbjs 1y ago
Can't remember, was like 10 years ago. But basically after I finished mastering the last feature I needed to, probably macros.
11.
by sbjs 1y ago
To clarify, I don't mean that Rich didn't also have extremely good reasons to make Clojure, given he was using Java (and maybe C++) in 2007 . They're not the best languages now, but they were so broken back then that they
12.
by sbjs 1y ago
I thought it was self explanatory. It had new idioms I had not yet learned and internalized, so I fully absorbed it. When that was finished, I needed something else to do the same thing with. It's like listening to a song on repeat 10-
13.
by sbjs 1y ago
I guess that confirms my theory.
14.
Why I ever wrote Clojure(thesoftwarephilosopher.com)
89 points by sbjs 1y ago|50 comments
15.
Build.js.dev.build(thesoftwarephilosopher.com)
1 points by sbjs 1y ago|1 comments
16.
Build.js.dev.build(thesoftwarephilosopher.com)
1 points by sbjs 1y ago|0 comments
17.
A New Way to Vendor(immaculata.dev)
1 points by sbjs 1y ago|0 comments
18.
by sbjs 1y ago
Thanks, yeah it sounds like we have similar goals. Where's your project so I can take a look?
19.
Immaculata(immaculata.dev)
4 points by sbjs 1y ago|3 comments
20.
Show HN: Immaculata.dev, TypeScript DX Primitives(immaculata.dev)
1 points by sbjs 1y ago|0 comments
21.
Show HN: Immaculata.dev, web build tool for engineers(immaculata.dev)
1 points by sbjs 1y ago|0 comments
22.
Show HN: Immaculata, simple front-end build tool(github.com)
1 points by sbjs 2y ago|0 comments
23.
by sbjs 2y ago
Your patience with Michael Saboff is incredible.
24.
Standardize JSX while there's time(thesoftwarephilosopher.com)
1 points by sbjs 2y ago|0 comments
25.
by sbjs 2y ago
Infeasible not because it's difficult but because you have more awareness of your limited time that you have to prioritize, and maintaining software falls lower and lower on the list of things you should do.
26.
I can't delete my framework(thesoftwarephilosopher.com)
2 points by sbjs 2y ago|2 comments
27.
Show HN: A new way to create universal/ssr TypeScript apps with JSX(github.com)
1 points by sbjs 3y ago|0 comments
28.
by sbjs 3y ago
Yes.
29.
by sbjs 3y ago
I posted an example in the thread.
30.
by sbjs 3y ago
Hi everyone. I know that's a bold statement you'd expect from a new coder and not an experienced guy unless it's the real deal. And I've got so many decades of experience that I'm really looking forward to hearing f

More ›