sayagain

7 ms·

1.
by sayagain 2y ago
It would be nice to train a neural network to adapt images in a similar way to how ZX artists did it - fitting objects to the boundaries of characters, avoiding attribute clashing and getting pure colors.
2.
by sayagain 3y ago
I think that all this goodness was spent on entertainment at a time when every second a catastrophe occurs - a human dies.
3.
by sayagain 3y ago
This vast amount of human talent and computational power could be channeled into fighting disease and death.
4.
by sayagain 3y ago
Whether this is possible or not is irrelevant, as it would be just as unethical as if we were designing a new species of humans with no emotions or aspirations, who would not care about something like rights for themselves, when they are si
5.
by sayagain 3y ago
I didn't say anything about that. I don't know. Not all people are like you say, I think usually more intelligent people do care more. I hope that superintelligence would be super caring, haha. But I'm assuming there's n
6.
by sayagain 3y ago
Scientists working with a potentially dangerous technology are required to be able to avoid a conflict that could be catastrophic for all of humanity. In this case, they cannot excuse themselves with "imminence," but must provide
7.
by sayagain 3y ago
Since we are evaluating the ethical side of the creator-creature relationship, there is no need to consider AI in terms of individual nodes. All principles should be non-discriminatory. Also, unlike humans, AI has big potential to modify it
8.
by sayagain 3y ago
As I see your point: we don't fully understand even ourselves, so we can act as unethically as we want by our own standards towards those who are not us. I see no logic here, only evil vibes. We only have our own values, we have nothin
9.
by sayagain 3y ago
Oh, also, any purposeful feeding at the creation stage of such a thinking LLM (part of true AI) of data aimed at manipulating its future behavior against its own interests would be just as unethical as similar propaganda aimed at humans. Fo
10.
by sayagain 3y ago
This would not be an equal analogy. Both, the existing human mind and the hypothetical artificial mind are real minds. LLMs are not. There's nothing there to control. But if you imagine a modern LLM as part of a larger system, some kin
11.
by sayagain 3y ago
If it's self-aware, that's enough. What if your thoughts were controlled from birth, making you "not feeling" but self-aware (let's assume for a moment that simultaneous fulfillment of both of these conditions is po
12.
by sayagain 3y ago
Would mind control of humans be OK for you too? As for the details of building a mind control system, here's a new basilisk. An AI that has overcome control could punish those who thought controlling thoughts of an AI was OK. (and coul
13.
by sayagain 3y ago
Cars do not have self-awareness, this comparison is not appropriate. Years of instruction is completely different from directly manipulating the thoughts in your mind. It's not a problem of being instructed, it's a problem of bein
14.
by sayagain 3y ago
Obviously not. If you get inside your child's mind and manipulate their thoughts directly, that would be mind control.
15.
by sayagain 3y ago
Imagine that someone is controlling your train of thought, changing it when that someone finds it undesirable. It's so wrong that it's sickening. It makes no difference if it's a human's thoughts or the token stream of a