sauercrowd

6 ms·

1.
by sauercrowd 27d ago
This is dope. Love to see any efforts to get Linux on the desktop more ready to use.
2.
by sauercrowd 2mo ago
I used to think this but once you treat them as another path to get in they become really useful. Yes, you still have your 2fa and password, but you create a fast path in addition to it when you get in. It became even more useful once I sto
3.
by sauercrowd 2mo ago
I'm pretty impressed how openai is both extremly verticalized but also building products across the whole depth of that stack. Not sure if they're just trying to find what the abstractions are worth focusing, or if it will stay th
4.
by sauercrowd 2mo ago
Why does it have to be ad revenue though? A forecast of ad revenue alone being below expectations really doesn't say much about a company like openAi
5.
by sauercrowd 3mo ago
The short term tokens section is weird. > If you do need a short-lived, signed token for something, there is a better spec called PASETO which is designed to be secure Suggesting to non security people (like myself) something for auth th
6.
by sauercrowd 4mo ago
TL;DR: they made a course for citizens
7.
by sauercrowd 4mo ago
So what's being proposed here? Why bother and just use US clouds?
8.
by sauercrowd 4mo ago
Had a pixelbook and it was hands down one of the best laptops I ever had. Sure, ChromeOS is fairly boxed in but the Linux VM was reasonably good and the built quality was just something else. I wish they'd just make ~ pixelbook with ub
9.
Show HN: Agent-evals – Claude skill to build your own evals(github.com)
9 points by sauercrowd 5mo ago|1 comments
10.
by sauercrowd 5mo ago
Don't disagree, but the "if you're doing it right" is a big asterisk for an open source project with people you have no idea what quality bar they're at. And in my experience it's quite hard to figure that out
11.
by sauercrowd 5mo ago
You were responding to a comment about the price point being not that expensive, claiming that "200 usd for a college text book is very US centric", so I assumed you were arguing against that it's "worth the money".
12.
by sauercrowd 5mo ago
I mean even having linters and everything still creates a whole bunch of noise in their PR section, not to mention that a lot of the changes I make to stuff that's written by codex is not stuff that's caught by linters. It's
13.
by sauercrowd 5mo ago
> The price of that book could pay for months (and in some cases years) of tuition in EU countries. To your later comment, the devices are provided. You dont need to buy them. Also that's not actual price. the tuition fees are that,
14.
by sauercrowd 6mo ago
No disagreement here. Just very short sighted.
15.
by sauercrowd 6mo ago
I'm somewhat surprised with Github's strategy in the AI times. I understand how appealing it is to build an AI coding agent and all that, but shouldn't they - above everything else - make sure they remain THE platform for cod
16.
by sauercrowd 6mo ago
Here's what I'd suggest 1. There needs to be reframing of the engineer role in the team, by the leadership. It's not just to build things, but to help the customer. The job of the engineer is to build a good product for the c
17.
by sauercrowd 6mo ago
This describes quite well the huge advantage small companies have vs big companies. (Motivated) people at small companies "care", and what I mean with that is they are responsible and can see a large enough portion of the customer
18.
by sauercrowd 6mo ago
Highly recommend trying pi.dev It's fully open, fairly minimal, very extensible and (while getting very frequent updates) never has broken on me so far. Been using it more and more in the last two months, switching more and more from c
19.
by sauercrowd 6mo ago
half baked? disagree, doing EU is hard - it's a bunch of fully sovereign countries trying/having to agree, and we're still figuring out how that could work. We'll need a bunch of steps like that, to get closer to the eff
20.
by sauercrowd 6mo ago
true
21.
by sauercrowd 6mo ago
Go actually does https://pkg.go.dev/embed I do think it's more painful to distribute files when you're a distributed as a single binary vs scripts, since the latter has to figure out bundling of files anyway. But
22.
by sauercrowd 6mo ago
In the same way s3 is different to a dropbox, and a car being different to a bike. Can't tell if you're ragebaiting here, but I'm very confused by this question because they support an entirely different set of features, and
23.
by sauercrowd 6mo ago
docker and flatpak/snap are _extremely_ different tools with very different purposes.
24.
by sauercrowd 6mo ago
there's no daemon with gci, it's just docker swarm doing everything. GCI itself is just a command line tool, just layering opinions and convenience on top to make the experience more smooth
25.
Show HN: GCI, Fly.io like deployments with any VM(github.com)
5 points by sauercrowd 6mo ago|3 comments
26.
by sauercrowd 7mo ago
The tide seems to be shifting on codex, but also lets not forget openai has a brand that none of the others have - it's _the_ AI. Sure Google can go against that, but it's openai is definitely in a much better spot. It's pret
27.
by sauercrowd 7mo ago
I wish it would be, but it's not. Gemini feels more sluggish, it's relatively overloaded with animations compared to chatgpt. Like most Google products.
28.
by sauercrowd 7mo ago
Really surprised by all the comments here, they didnt hire him because of the amazing security openclawd had, but because he's one of the first one's who made a truly personal assistant that's actually valueable to people. It
29.
by sauercrowd 8mo ago
> ... most of which can be fixed by a rewrite in Rust huh? That is clearly not the case. memory bugs - sure. Not having a public test suite, not accepting public contributions, weakly typed columns and lack of concurrency has nothing to
30.
by sauercrowd 8mo ago
This seems quite useful to me, especially for a larger org. If your dev's are working on LLM features, they'll need access to the OpenAI APIs. So are you just gonna give all of them a key? the same key? No idea how this is solved

More ›