saturatedfat

7 ms·

1.
by saturatedfat 8mo ago
I think for days at a time still. I don’t think you can get the same satisfaction out of these tools if what you want to do is not novel. If you are exploring the space of possibilities for which there are no clear solutions, then you have
2.
by saturatedfat 8mo ago
let me take a shot. i have thought about both for a while. dspy is declarative. you say what you want. dspy says “if you can say what you want in my format, I will let you extract as much value from current LLMs as possible” with its infere
3.
by saturatedfat 9mo ago
i made a clone of beads in rust that uses CRDTs for real time sync to coordinate a bunch of coding agents at the same time! if running locally, it's instant, for git it takes around .6s after your last action. lives entirely in git, an
4.
by saturatedfat 10mo ago
it doesnt control for skill using models/experience using models. this looks VERY different at hour 1000 and hour 5000 than hour 100.
5.
by saturatedfat 10mo ago
unfair characterization. think about how this thing is interacting with your codebase. it can read one file at a time. sections of files. in this UX, is it ergonomic to go hunting for patterns and conventions? if u have to linearly process
6.
by saturatedfat 10mo ago
could u share some more intuition as to why you started believing that? are there ANY comments that are useful?
7.
by saturatedfat 10mo ago
for the love of the mf game. most fun i’ve had with computers in my whole life
8.
by saturatedfat 10mo ago
very very cool .
9.
by saturatedfat 10mo ago
yes but ud ideally want ur own high uptime mac mini
10.
by saturatedfat 10mo ago
heya, building this. been used in prod for a month now, has saved my customer’s ass while building general workflow automation agents. happy to chat if ur interested. darin@mcptesting.com (gist: evals as a service)
11.
by saturatedfat 1y ago
writing an essay on this if you'd be interested in reading a rough draft. i believe this very strongly and i think it's the UX that got us here and it's UX that'll take us out.
12.
by saturatedfat 1y ago
quintessential hacker news comment. thanks for this.
13.
by saturatedfat 2y ago
Would you guys consider adding a llms.txt ?
14.
by saturatedfat 2y ago
Is the OneTool source not available? Also, do you guys do something similar to: https://github.com/frankfralick/dripgrep ? (for the curious, the README for this repo is 100% worth taking a look at!)
15.
by saturatedfat 2y ago
Really cool! Had a couple questions: - how far does the $50/mo get you? - what's the battery life like/going to be like? - do yall allow people or plan to allow people to swap out (some) of the models or orchestrate them your
16.
by saturatedfat 2y ago
why can’t you feed the chat history back in at every forward call?
17.
by saturatedfat 2y ago
wrote a blog post on using DSPy and why it’s powerful. tried to keep simple, understandable, concrete. https://www.darinkishore.com/posts/mcp#building-tools-that-l...
18.
by saturatedfat 2y ago
hi! wrote a lil blog post on tool design for MCP, was wondering what you think? https://www.darinkishore.com/posts/mcp/
19.
by saturatedfat 2y ago
Supermaven, but you don’t get model choice.
20.
by saturatedfat 2y ago
It’s helpful for people who are new to using things on the terminal. I use a similar version with the ctrl+l hotkey, you can do most things on the terminal just by typing english now. That+fish is an amazing introduction to the shell. Total