sarmad

7 ms·

1.
by sarmad 11y ago
Does scheme give you access to the compiler's internal data structures? Can you for example write an extension that scans through the compiled code looking for, say, for loops and replacing them with something else?
2.
by sarmad 11y ago
It's not my goal to make the system able to parse arbitrary existing languages. The parser can deal with ambiguity by branching parsing states, but despite that it still won't be easy to parse inherently ambiguous grammars, and ev
3.
by sarmad 11y ago
My language is not only about user defined syntax; it's also about user defined code generation. For example, you can define your own syntax that compiles directly into a DB stored procedure or into GPU shader, or into whatever technol
4.
by sarmad 11y ago
I am. I am working on a new programming language designed for the next generations. The language re-imagines the role of the compiler from being a monolithic static blackbox that converts source to executable, into being an open dynamic sys
5.
Underscore vs Camelcase Naming Convention(code-cruising.net)
1 points by sarmad 16y ago|0 comments
6.
Web Security Overdone?(sarmad-khalid.info)
1 points by sarmad 16y ago|0 comments
7.
by sarmad 17y ago
Another one of those disorganized people wishing the world can become disorganized as well so they can live in it. Face it, hierarchical file systems have been around for decades, and if this proves anything, it proves that hierarchical fil
8.
by sarmad 17y ago
I guess I can say that's a game with history about history :)