Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
sandeepkd
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
18 ms
·
1.
▲
by
sandeepkd
5d ago
From what I have seen this subject needs a lot more attention than what it receives which translates in the reality that in almost majority of the places the access rules are pretty open from inside. This is one area where centralization (u
2.
▲
by
sandeepkd
10d ago
Airbnb has this project with the same name as well , https://viaduct.airbnb.tech/ , for a second I was confused if that got changed somehow
3.
▲
by
sandeepkd
10d ago
My understanding is that the people are conflating the ability to translate and replicate as creativity/learning. Not to say that its not possible but its a long way to go for sure.
4.
▲
by
sandeepkd
11d ago
So looks like you pay AI to resolve incidents and then pay money and time for engineers to get training on synthetic incident resolutions. The comparison with Pilots is bit disjoint one cause the domain varies a lot for every company and pr
5.
▲
by
sandeepkd
12d ago
The headline is not wrong, its intentionally worded that way to mellow down the message. Its for the people who use their own custom domains to send emails via google without paying for the workspace by verifying the domain ownership (its a
6.
▲
by
sandeepkd
12d ago
That should not be impacted, in fact thats the whole point. tldr; Google is trying to monetize everything, if you have a use case for using personal custom domains then move to google workspace
7.
▲
by
sandeepkd
12d ago
Started with a theory that it might be a possibility where google as a Ad business is trying to make money for their AI expenses from consumer. However after verifying the results for the items mentioned in the article plus some more and I
8.
▲
by
sandeepkd
15d ago
Founder Mode is just a marketing slang, not sure if that has much of an impact on business. Putting that aside Airbnb falls in an interesting category of business. It had the first mover advantage of getting into a market segment which was
9.
▲
by
sandeepkd
17d ago
Eating other animals and being able to digest other animals can be two different things. Feels like that should have been a part of such an article.
10.
▲
by
sandeepkd
18d ago
I wonder if the original organizers would have much say left if something becomes big enough and successful. It requires a very strong mindset to close something down. Makes me think about the batman movie debacle on some wanting to destroy
11.
▲
by
sandeepkd
18d ago
No I am not alluding the financing, the value for both companies for sure. It may not be exactly circular financing still Warp is getting subsidized tokens to use at this point. Once the customers are locked in the full pricing is going to
12.
▲
by
sandeepkd
18d ago
I think sharing such ideas openly allows people to converge on similar feelings and experience which eventually leads to people experimenting these for real. We need to take into account that a lot of people reading and writing these kind o
13.
▲
by
sandeepkd
18d ago
I was bit confused in the beginning thinking its some product from Anthropic, looks like Warp is the startup, most likely getting rebate on using Claude and providing functionality to users, trying to get them addicted to the feature. And A
14.
▲
by
sandeepkd
19d ago
Personally I feel the password migration feature should never be supported. Its ripe for abuse once you open up a pathway to it. SCIM as a protocol was meant to solve this problem, if everyone could just implement it.
15.
▲
by
sandeepkd
19d ago
I do not really want to defend any of the companies here but the reality is that documentation is always a thankless job. People do it to get their project out there, get limelight and move on. There is not much incentive for the teams to m
16.
▲
by
sandeepkd
19d ago
Its interesting how this felt so natural and right way to do software. I remember people referencing it as the north star. And then gradually people came close to it but moved past it. Personally I feel that these concepts require to have g
17.
▲
by
sandeepkd
20d ago
Its a yes if you do not know the domain space, query patterns well enough and also if the cost of optimization or time for optimization may have detrimental impact to business. In this case it most likely means that the crowd in the room di
18.
▲
by
sandeepkd
20d ago
I do not know if I would consider stopping the climate change as a solution for all such events. Watching the video makes you realize how small you are in front of the nature. It feels painful to even watch it but its an eyeopener at the sa
19.
▲
by
sandeepkd
21d ago
I wish that was true some how. In real world unfortunately the buck stops at whoever is easy scape goat, at times it can be a CEO
20.
▲
by
sandeepkd
21d ago
This is highly subjective and a gives an impression that every one is doing a very effective job. The reality is much more grey when you account for so many companies that get shut down. My personal take, somewhere down the line people feel
21.
▲
by
sandeepkd
21d ago
Not sure if I would agree to that completely. Free tier is always ripe for abuse so in the beginning for a long time, Github has this requirement that you can only have a public repository if you are a non-paying user. Somewhere down the ro
22.
▲
by
sandeepkd
21d ago
I think somewhere down the line you have an answer to problem itself. Its for a while that companies are not into the business of sympathies, we should probably not get into that side for the topic. 1. Github has enterprise users who paid f
23.
▲
by
sandeepkd
21d ago
The structure already exists for a particular set of client , browsers in normal scenario here. The debate is on the topic of relative value from maintaining two different set of structures, one for browsers and another for agents
24.
▲
by
sandeepkd
21d ago
To clarify, I am referring to the information present on the webpage which the users using the website are already consuming. The page already has a structure, thats how browser is able to display it to end user. Its just not tailored expli
25.
▲
by
sandeepkd
21d ago
This feels inverted and impractical in so many ways. On one hand the claims are being made that AI is smart enough to replace software engineers and on other hand the website owners are beings asked to provide information in a certain forma
26.
▲
by
sandeepkd
22d ago
Of course, we just need to figure out how every person on earth would make at least $7,000 after they loose their job on the name of AI. (Assuming they need at least $3,500 for other basic needs).
27.
▲
by
sandeepkd
23d ago
I think there are two parts to it 1. Execution of engineering task - Companies happen to focus on this mostly and this is the metric to measure easily. Using LLM tools gives a impression of improvement on this area which is what everyone is
28.
▲
by
sandeepkd
24d ago
the last paragraph was probably most important one here, and the lesson is If you truly want to enforce a validation then it has to be in the backend, the client side validation is just additional luxury if you can afford it. On a different
29.
▲
by
sandeepkd
24d ago
A hazardous system does not necessarily has to be complex. The article is a generalized list which makes it bit harder to reason with on this topic. A big part of the complexity gets added over the time as a part of failures, effort to intr
30.
▲
by
sandeepkd
24d ago
Its a good thing that the Author pointed out the caveat cause most companies/teams/people do not operate in this mode. Subtle in the details is a fact hidden that the author is able to manage what he wants to do, most people do no
More ›