Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
samwho
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
Domains by the Numbers
(dotcom.press)
3 points
by
samwho
2mo ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
by
samwho
2mo ago
You are extremely welcome.
3.
▲
by
samwho
2mo ago
Sam Rose here. Thank you <3
4.
▲
by
samwho
3mo ago
I gave my boss every opportunity to stop me.
5.
▲
by
samwho
3mo ago
Single browser.
6.
▲
by
samwho
3mo ago
I learned that etcd wasn’t required while making webernetes! I’d always thought it was, was cool to learn some clusters use other storage backends.
7.
▲
by
samwho
3mo ago
Completely agree! Wasn’t trying to discourage, hope it doesn’t have that effect.
8.
▲
by
samwho
3mo ago
Thank you! To address the earlier comment: I didn’t go down the “implement the OS-level stuff required to get k8s to compile to wasm” path due to bundle size, honestly and truly. My testing indicated it could be over 10Mb, and I didn’t want
9.
▲
by
samwho
3mo ago
I’d guess that about 90% of the webernetes code is ported directly from the Kubernetes codebase. In that sense it is a port of Kubernetes to the browser. But the CRI and CNI are facsimiles created to work in the browser and for the purpose
10.
▲
by
samwho
3mo ago
I’m 100% confident it would be possible to do a worker-per-pod runtime. If you’re serious about trying to make it then slide into my DMs, would love to talk about it. I also think a CRI that supports WASM would be fairly easy. Volumes are o
11.
▲
by
samwho
3mo ago
This is it. If you’re building something novel, and you want to rely on LLMs, you need to invest heavily in making tests. You don’t have the luxury of a reference implementation like I did here.
12.
▲
by
samwho
3mo ago
I have some potentially bad news for you: https://samwho.dev/load-balancing https://encore.dev/blog/queueing
13.
▲
by
samwho
3mo ago
For some projects I think only reading the tests is probably fine. In this project I didn’t think it was enough purely because it’s a port of existing code, so there was a need to validate the port was as exact as it could be. Many projects
14.
▲
by
samwho
3mo ago
Web workers were on my mind from the start but I never found myself needing them. They were always my ace-in-the-hole if this ended up being too CPU hungry on the main thread but it never happened, so I didn’t bother. One of the fun things
15.
▲
by
samwho
3mo ago
Sadly Katacoda got paywalled (totally get why they did it, these things have costs). I think some other similar platforms disappeared because they ran out of people willing to fund it. It’s a shame. I’m hoping this offers an alternative. It
16.
▲
by
samwho
4mo ago
Looking really good! Great work.
17.
▲
by
samwho
6mo ago
You’re welcome! Thanks so much for the kind words.
18.
▲
by
samwho
6mo ago
Thank you!
19.
▲
by
samwho
6mo ago
“Zero point” is how I saw it referred to in the literature, so that’s what I went with. I personally prefer to think of it as an offset, but I try to stick with terms folks are likely to see in the wild.
20.
▲
by
samwho
6mo ago
Definitely could be, but in the time I spent talking to the 4-bit models in comparison to the 16-bit original it seemed surprisingly capable still. I do recommend benchmarking quantized models at the specific tasks you care about.
21.
▲
by
samwho
6mo ago
Thank you! I was really surprised how robust models are to losing information. It seems wrong that they can be compressed so much and still function at all, never mind function quite closely to the original size. Think we're only going
22.
▲
Quantization from the Ground Up
(ngrok.com)
351 points
by
samwho
6mo ago
|
59 comments
23.
▲
Don't blunder: better chess puzzles
(blunder.clinic)
3 points
by
samwho
6mo ago
|
2 comments
24.
▲
by
samwho
6mo ago
Thanks for linking to my silly little quiz in the article! :)
25.
▲
by
samwho
7mo ago
I wrote a tool called llmwalk ( https://github.com/samwho/llmwalk ) that’ll deterministically show you the likelihood the top N answers are for a given open model and prompt. No help on frontier models, but maybe helpful
26.
▲
Calculating the shortest path using just CSS
(css-tip.com)
1 points
by
samwho
7mo ago
|
0 comments
27.
▲
What those AI benchmark numbers mean
(ngrok.com)
5 points
by
samwho
8mo ago
|
1 comments
28.
▲
by
samwho
8mo ago
My mistake! Misunderstood the underlying dataset. Not sure how to edit it though. Thanks for calling it out.
29.
▲
Graph of All Human Languages
(dr.eamer.dev)
4 points
by
samwho
8mo ago
|
2 comments
30.
▲
by
samwho
8mo ago
Oh, you beat me to it! :D
More ›