samrus

6 ms·

1.
by samrus 4d ago
Exactly. People are expecting wode eyed optimism in response to some of the most cutthroat and cynical behavior from the leaders of the AI firms. Its crazy. They're making their bed but they dont want to lie in it
2.
by samrus 6d ago
Probably got outbid again. I love valve's business model/strategy/ethics, but its undeniable that a tradeoff for not being beholden to increasing shareholder value is that you often have less resources than your competitors f
3.
by samrus 8d ago
You have to look at the incentives
4.
by samrus 8d ago
I mean, they need to be able hide any weaknesses that will allow prison breaks. A prisoner or their collaborators can use this footage to gain intel about these things and break people out. People who might deserve being in prison, like mur
5.
by samrus 8d ago
I do love the irony and schedenfruede, but this isnt about recording in public areas, its about recording the inside of prisons and ICE concentration camps. That is generally not something you can legally record and is analogous to a flock
6.
by samrus 10d ago
Reputation lag. Or just exploiting trust
7.
by samrus 11d ago
Yeah. Exactly. Thats not a guarantee anymore
8.
by samrus 11d ago
Americans have to hope that the US will move past trumo and not repeat that mistake, but for europeans its most prudent to prepare for a world where such a corrupt wannabe distator doesnt have have that much leverage over them. The US and e
9.
by samrus 11d ago
Cost decreases with scale. Spacex was also wildly expensive, it grew up thanks to government assistance
10.
by samrus 11d ago
I dont think the EU is stronger when they get bullied and undermined by trump, or whichever american president decides to dust off trump's playbook in the future
11.
by samrus 13d ago
I like the idea of more reccurance in the transformer level. Chain of thought always seemed so clunky. Its just not the way the human brain processes information. Its an extrmeely crude approximation at best
12.
by samrus 14d ago
Its not that much. And you can just bypass it by accepting the first offer you get
13.
by samrus 14d ago
I get the arguments against it but what i really want is people having some easy digital way to interface with the tech around them. Having a small on person computer be a client to things in your life seems like a really cool thing to aim
14.
by samrus 14d ago
> The LLM output could then be any format that's easy and unambiguous to parse. Thats the problem isnt it? LLMs arent deterministic. Terrible for prod
15.
by samrus 16d ago
So if i disagree with him on that i must disagree with him on this too? Thats disengenuous
16.
by samrus 18d ago
They dont want to kill the industry, they want consumers to be informed of the risks and stakes. If that makes consumers not want to consume tobacco then tough luck but the tobacco industry cant be allowed to operate based on lies and misdi
17.
by samrus 19d ago
Yeah and thats going really shittily. The richest country in the world has housing crisises while the stock market reaches all time highs. Veterans are homeless. Teachers are quiting because theyre underpaid. Its clear the deal was ruined a
18.
by samrus 19d ago
No becuase citizenship implies deep cultural and philosophical values as well. You cant switch those that quickly Another reason is that the responsibilities between citizen and society are fulfilled on a long timescale. A society will educ
19.
by samrus 20d ago
Citizenship, while usually a circumstance of birth, comes with a a shared responsibility of the society one is a citizen of. That responsibility also goes the other way, where the society has a duty to look out for the citizen While it suck
20.
by samrus 20d ago
trolling very close to the sun
21.
by samrus 20d ago
I think its more anologous to a bank giving out a loan. There, rhe bank doesnt count any principle repayments as revenue, only interest repayments. The principal repayments are what the bank is "returning" to whoever owned the mon
22.
by samrus 23d ago
I wouldnt call those people smart. They might be playing a game optimally in the short term, but they are ruining a long term system. And i dont mean centuries, but decades. They need the general population 20 years from now to have grown u
23.
by samrus 25d ago
Hard numbers. Like output, or investment made. Like number of cars, tons of steel, etc. Things that actually reflect reality
24.
by samrus 27d ago
By what metric is twitter dead? I dont like twotter but i still see content from it linked everywhere
25.
by samrus 29d ago
Yeah. Itd be ideal if companies could adjust their existing employees wages fairly. This alternative of people moving frequently creates a high turnover org which isnt efficient. But if employers dont compensate their existing employees fai
26.
by samrus 1mo ago
This appears to not be discussing the article at all. To me it looks like and attempt at IDF propaganda
27.
by samrus 1mo ago
This is such a naive and uninformed take. I hate AI threads, it atracts the worse discourse
28.
by samrus 1mo ago
Not necessarily. They said AI doesnt review or decide. So it sounds to me that while AI might be used in ptocessing paperwork, the whole processing pipeline is reviewed by humans and the final decision is made by humans. So these sort of th
29.
by samrus 1mo ago
Theyre holding on for dear life but its futile i think. Renewables will be the future and they wont have that political leverage attached. Geopolitics is about to become more equitable. Itll be interesting to see what that looks like. Idk i
30.
by samrus 1mo ago
Im sure theirs still market dominance to be had. But it wont be at the level that the US has with oil. This isnt just market dominance, its complete economic dominance. The US can controll all money because oil is sold in dollars. That wont

More ›